Q33PGB

Question

Computing and journalizing standard cost variances

 

Middleton manufactures coffee mugs that it sells to other companies for customizing with their own logos. Middleton prepares flexible budgets and uses a standard cost system to control manufacturing costs. The standard unit cost of a coffee mug is based on static budget volume of 59,800 coffee mugs per month:

 

Direct Materials (0.2 lbs. @ \(0.25 per lb.)                                              \) 0.05

Direct Labor (3 minutes @ \(0.14 per minute)                                          0.42

Manufacturing Overhead:

    Variable (3 minutes @ \)0.06 per minute)                           \( 0.18

    Fixed (3 minutes @ \)0.13 per minute)                                   0.39        0.57

Total Cost per Coffee Mug \(                                                                     1.04

 

Actual cost and production information for July 2018 follows:

a. There were no beginning or ending inventory balances. All expenditures were on account.

b. Actual production and sales were 62,500 coffee mugs.

c. Actual direct materials usage was 11,000 lbs. at an actual cost of \)0.17 per lb.

d. Actual direct labor usage of 197,000 minutes at a cost of \(33,490.

e. Actual overhead cost was \)10,835 variable and \(29,965 fixed.

f. Selling and administrative costs were \)130,000.

 

Requirements

1. Compute the cost and efficiency variances for direct materials and direct labor.

2. Journalize the purchase and usage of direct materials and the assignment of direct

labor, including the related variances.

3. For manufacturing overhead, compute the variable overhead cost and efficiency variances and the fixed overhead cost and volume variances.

4. Journalize the actual manufacturing overhead and the allocated manufacturing overhead. Journalize the movement of all production from Work in Process Inventory. Journalize the adjusting of the Manufacturing Overhead account.

5. Middleton intentionally hired more highly skilled workers during July. How did this decision affect the cost variances? Overall, was the decision wise?

 

Step-by-Step Solution

Verified
Answer
  1. Direct material cost variance and direct material efficiency variances depict a favourable balance.
  2. Wages payable = $33,490
  3. Variable overhead cost variance and fixed overhead volume variance depict a favourable balance
  4. Fixed overhead cost variance = $6,643
  5. Middleton made a poor choice by hiring more skilled direct labourers.
1Step 1: Meaning of WIP Inventory

Work-in-process (WIP) depicts a stock thing that’s only somewhat finished. On the off chance that the company is manufacturing tangible products instead of rendering services, the value of that mostly completed stock may moreover show up on the balance sheet as the product in the process.

2Step 2: (1) computing the cost and efficiency variances

Direct material cost variance

Direct material cost variance=Actual quantity×Actual priceActual quantity×Standard price=Actual quantity×Actual priceStandard price=11,000×$0.17$0.25=$880 Favourable 

Direct material efficiency variance

Standard quantity=Standard quantity per unit×Actual production=0.20×62,500=12,500 

Direct material efficiency variance=Actual quantityStandard quantity×Standard price=11,00012,500×$0.25=$375 Favourable 

Direct labor cost variance 

Actual rate=Actual rateActual direct labor usage=$33,490197,000=$0.17 

 

Direct labor cost variance=Actual costStandard​ cost of Actual cost=$33,490197,000×$0.14=$5,910 Unfavourable 

Direct labor efficiency variance

Standard time allowed=Standard minutes×Actual production=3×62,500=187,000

Direct labor efficiency variance=Actual hours×Standard rateStandard hours×Standard rate=197,000×$0.14187,500×$0.14=$1,330 Unfavourable


3Step 3: (2) Preparing journal entries

Date

Particulars

Debit ($)

Credit ($)

 

Direct material inventory

2,750

 

 

    Accounts payable  11,000×$0.17

 

      1,870

 

    Direct materials price variance

 

      880

 

 

 

 

 

Work-in-progress inventory

3,125

 

 

    Direct materials efficiency variance

 

      375

 

    Raw materials Inventory

 

      2,750

 

 

 

 

 

Journal entries to record labour transaction

Date

Particulars

Debit ($)

Credit ($)

 

Work-in-process inventory

26,250

 

 

Direct labor cost variance

5,910

 

 

Direct labor efficiency variance

1,330

 

 

    Wages payable  

 

      33,490

 

 

 

 

4Step 4: (3) Computing the variable overhead cost and efficiency variances and the fixed overhead cost and volume variances

Variable overhead efficiency variance

Variable overhead efficiency variance=Actual quantityStandard quantity×Standard cost=197,000187,500×$0.06=$570 Unfavourable 

 

Variable overhead cost variance

Variable overhead cost variance=Actual cost Actual hours×Standard​ price=$10,835197,000×$0.06=$985 Favourable 

Allocated fixed overhead

Allocated fixed overhead=Standard fixed overhead allocation rate×Standard quantity=$0.13×3×62,500=$24,375 

Fixed overhead cost variance

Fixedoverhead cost variance=Actual fixed overheadBudgeted fixed overhead=$29,965$23,222=$6,643 Unfavourable 

Fixed overhead volume variance

Fixed overhead volume variance=Budgeted fixed overheadAllocated fixed overhead=$23,322$24,375=$1,053 Favourable 

5Step 5: (4) Preparing journal entries

Date

Particulars

Debit ($)

Credit ($)

 

Manufacturing overhead   $29,965+$10,835

40,800

 

 

    Various accounts

 

     40,800

 

 

 

 

 

Work-in-process inventory    62,500×$0.57   

35,625

 

 

    Manufacturing overhead

 

     35,625

 

 

 

 

 

Finished goods inventory     62,500×$1.04    

65,000

 

 

    Work-in-process inventory

 

     65,000

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed overhead cost variance

6,643

 

 

Variable overhead efficiency variance

570

 

 

    Variable overhead cost variance

 

      985

 

    Fixed overhead volume variance

 

      1,053

 

    Manufacturing overhead

 

      5,175

 

 

 

 

6Step 6: (5) Explaining the decision that affects cost variance.

The rate of skilled people employed by MT Company is high. Actual labour costs per minute are $0.17, which is more than the average rate of $0.14. Higher actual costs resulted, which is not advantageous to the company.

 

Additionally, efficient work is anticipated to be produced by skilled individuals. Nevertheless, the actual hours used (197,000) exceeded the permitted hours (187,500).

The outcome of the decision was foolish, and the unfavourable variance shows that the business could not manage expenditures within the acceptable range.

The MT Company's choice to hire more skilled personnel led to a $3,940 unfavourable change in direct labour costs.

The direct labour efficiency variation also had a negative impact of $1,045.

Overall, the decision MT Company made was unwise.