Problem 8 - An Introduction to Theories of Personality

Question

Freud contends that we are capable of repressing intense anger, which remains powerful but unconscious. Kelly argues that there is no such thing as latent or repressed hostility, but only the failure to construe our behavior correctly. Which view do you prefer? Why?

Step-by-Step Solution

Answer

This answer will be subjective and varies depending on which viewpoint the student has chosen to support and their reasoning for doing so. An example could be that they chose Freud's view because they have noticed times in their own life when unexplained behaviours could be attributed to unconscious repressed emotions.

Step 1: Understanding Freud's Point of View

Freud believed that intense emotions, like anger, can be repressed or pushed out of conscious awareness. However, these emotions maintain their power and can influence behavior and feelings on an unconscious level. This viewpoint suggests that people may have latent hostility they're not aware of.

Step 2: Understanding Kelly's Point of View

Kelly, on the other hand, argued that there's no such thing as repressed hostility. Instead, he suggested that what might be perceived as latent anger is instead a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of our behavior. Therefore, according to Kelly, there are not any hidden or unconscious hostile feelings.

Step 3: Formulating an Opinion

After understanding both viewpoints, it's time to decide which one you believe to be more accurate or relatable. This may require some introspection or recalling personal experiences. You might personally relate more to Freud's theory if you observe periods in your life where repressed emotions had a subconscious influence on your actions. Conversely, if you believe that there is always a logical explanation for your actions and reactions, you might side more with Kelly's argument.

Step 4: Supporting Your Opinion

Once you have chosen which view resonates more, explain why using supporting evidence or reasoning. This could be a personal experience, a relevant psychological study, or an analogy. Your reasoning should clearly explain why the chosen theory feels more accurate or relevant to you.