Problem 16
Question
\(\cdot\) Express each of the following approximations of \(\pi\) to six significant figures: (a) \(22 / 7,(\) b) 35\(/ 113 .\) (c) Are these approximations accurate to that precision?
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Both 22/7 and 35/113 are not accurate to six significant figures.
1Step 1: Understand Significant Figures
Significant figures reflect the precision of a number. Here, six significant figures mean that you need to round or express the number to contain exactly six digits that contribute to its precision, starting from the first non-zero digit.
2Step 2: Calculate 22/7
Divide 22 by 7 to find this approximation of \(\pi\). This yields a repeating decimal \(3.142857\). The significant figures round this to \(3.14286\).
3Step 3: Calculate 35/113
Divide 35 by 113 to find this approximation of \(\pi\). The result is approximately \(0.3106\) repeating. Expressed to six significant figures, it is \(0.310618\).
4Step 4: Compare with True Value of π
The true value of \(\pi\) is \(3.14159\) approximately (to six significant figures). Compare this with the resulting approximations from steps 2 and 3.
5Step 5: Analyze the Precision
\(22/7\)'s approximation \(3.14286\) is not accurate to six significant figures because it's different from \(\pi\) after the fourth digit. \(35/113\) as \(0.310618\) is not accurate either because it does not represent the right precision for \(\pi\).
Key Concepts
Approximations of PiPrecision and AccuracyMathematical Calculations
Approximations of Pi
Approximating π can be quite fun and enlightening because it involves comparing different fractions and seeing how close they get to \(\pi\). Everyone's favorite infinite number is essential in mathematics for measurements involving circles. Commonly known approximations are \(\frac{22}{7}\) and \(\frac{35}{113}\).
Understanding approximations helps solidify the concept that while certain fractions can be close representations, they may not perfectly encapsulate the precision of the irrational number \(\pi\). It's a vivid example of how infinite decimals differ from fixed ratios.
- When we calculate \(\frac{22}{7}\), we get approximately \(3.142857\), which rounds to \(3.14286\) when considering six significant figures.
- Similarly, \(\frac{35}{113}\) yields approximately \(0.3106\) repeating, which rounds to \(0.310618\) when expressed to six significant figures.
Understanding approximations helps solidify the concept that while certain fractions can be close representations, they may not perfectly encapsulate the precision of the irrational number \(\pi\). It's a vivid example of how infinite decimals differ from fixed ratios.
Precision and Accuracy
Precision refers to the level of detail in the representation of a number, while accuracy describes how close this number comes to the true or accepted value. In the context of approximations, these two play a critical role.
When you look at numbers like \(\frac{22}{7}\) and \(\frac{35}{113}\), they have specific levels of precision depending on how they are expressed. Precision is all about the significant figures we select. For example:
Moreover, inaccuracies often emerge when approximation methods, like converting infinite decimals, inherently limit the accuracy due to their inability to capture every nuance of irrational or complex numbers.
When you look at numbers like \(\frac{22}{7}\) and \(\frac{35}{113}\), they have specific levels of precision depending on how they are expressed. Precision is all about the significant figures we select. For example:
- With \(3.14286\), there are six significant figures, but this doesn't necessarily guarantee it's accurate compared to the true value of \(\pi\).
- Similarly, \(0.310618\) maintains six significant figures, but its distance from \(\pi\) tells a different story in terms of accuracy.
Moreover, inaccuracies often emerge when approximation methods, like converting infinite decimals, inherently limit the accuracy due to their inability to capture every nuance of irrational or complex numbers.
Mathematical Calculations
Performing mathematical calculations with fractions and significant figures presents an opportunity to refine one's mathematical prowess. The process involves working through steps systematically and involves competing considerations of precision and the absolute representing number's closeness to the actual target.
Here's an engaging refresher on what to keep in mind when handling mathematics with approximations and calculations:
Here's an engaging refresher on what to keep in mind when handling mathematics with approximations and calculations:
- First, converting fractions into decimal form is the initial step. This helps in visualizing and understanding the number's proximity to constants like π.
- Next, rounding off to a specific number of significant figures embodies the intricacies involved in the computation, providing insight into how nicer or simpler forms can sometimes overlook important details.
- Analyzing and comparing these rounded off values with true mathematical constants stresses fundamental concepts and encourages curiosity.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 14
\(\bullet\) Some commonly occurring quantities. All of the quantities that follow will occur frequently in your study of physics. (a) Express the speed of light
View solution Problem 15
\(\cdot\) Express each of the following numbers to three, five, and eight significant figures: (a) \(\pi=3.141592654 \ldots,\) (b) \(e=\) \(2.718281828 \ldots,(
View solution Problem 17
\(\cdot\) An angle is given, to one significant figure, as \(4^{\circ},\) meaning that its value is between \(3.5^{\circ}\) and \(4.5^{\circ} .\) Find the corre
View solution Problem 18
\(\cdot\) Blood is thicker than water. The density (mass divided by volume) of pure water is \(1.00 \mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3},\) that of whole blood is \(1.0
View solution