Problem 1
Question
Let \(a, b, d \in \mathbb{Z}\) with \(d \neq 0 .\) Show that \(a \mid b\) if and only if \(d a \mid d b\).
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Question: Prove that for integers \(a, b, d \in \mathbb{Z}\) with \(d \neq 0\), \(a\) divides \(b\) (\(a \mid b\)) if and only if \(d\cdot a\) divides \(d\cdot b\) (\(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\)).
Answer: We proved that if \(a \mid b\), then \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\), and if \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\), then \(a \mid b\). Thus, \(a \mid b\) if and only if \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\) for \(a, b, d \in \mathbb{Z}\) with \(d \neq 0\).
1Step 1: Prove \(a \mid b\) implies \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\).
Assume that \(a \mid b\). This means that there exists some integer \(k\) such that \(b = a\cdot k\). We want to show that \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\). We can rewrite \(d\cdot b\) as \(d\cdot a\cdot k\) by substituting the expression for \(b\). Then, we see that \(d\cdot a\cdot k\) is a multiple of \(d\cdot a\). Thus, \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\).
2Step 2: Prove \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\) implies \(a \mid b\).
Assume that \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\). This means that there exists some integer \(k\) such that \(d\cdot b = d\cdot a\cdot k\). Since \(d \neq 0\), we can divide both sides of the equation by \(d\) to get \(b = a\cdot k\). This shows that \(a \mid b\), since \(b\) is a multiple of \(a\).
In conclusion, we have shown that \(a \mid b\) if and only if \(d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b\) for \(a, b, d \in \mathbb{Z}\) with \(d \neq 0\).
Key Concepts
Integer PropertiesEquivalence ProofAlgebraic Manipulation
Integer Properties
Let's dive into the world of integer properties with a look at divisibility. Divisibility can be simply thought of as one number being able to "evenly divide" another, i.e., without leaving a remainder. For instance, if 6 divides 2, we say that 6 is a divisor of 2.
When we say that an integer \( a \) divides another integer \( b \), it means there is some integer \( k \) such that \( b = a \times k \). This is written as \( a \mid b \). Another key property is the notion of non-zero divisors like \( d \) in this exercise, where \( d eq 0 \).
Understanding these integer properties helps build a foundation for exploring more complex algebraic concepts involving numbers.
When we say that an integer \( a \) divides another integer \( b \), it means there is some integer \( k \) such that \( b = a \times k \). This is written as \( a \mid b \). Another key property is the notion of non-zero divisors like \( d \) in this exercise, where \( d eq 0 \).
Understanding these integer properties helps build a foundation for exploring more complex algebraic concepts involving numbers.
Equivalence Proof
An equivalence proof demonstrates that two statements are logically equivalent, meaning they both imply each other. For this exercise, we show the two statements "\( a \mid b \)" and "\( d a \mid d b \)" are equivalent.
This equivalence means if the first statement is true, it guarantees the second statement is also true, and vice versa. It's a two-step process:
This equivalence means if the first statement is true, it guarantees the second statement is also true, and vice versa. It's a two-step process:
- First, start by assuming \( a \mid b \), and show it implies \( d a \mid d b \).
- Second, assume \( d a \mid d b \), and show that it implies \( a \mid b \).
Algebraic Manipulation
In this problem, algebraic manipulation is a crucial tool. It involves rearranging equations to show the relationships between different mathematical expressions. Starting with the given conditions, such as \( a \mid b \), leads to discovering other properties.
First, from \( a \mid b \), there is an integer \( k \) such that \( b = a \cdot k \). Using algebraic manipulation, substitute \( b \) into the expression \( d\cdot b \), obtaining \( d\cdot a\cdot k \). This manipulation confirms \( d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b \).
Reversing, assume \( d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b \). It implies there exists an integer \( k \) such that \( d\cdot b = d\cdot a\cdot k \). Dividing both sides by \( d \) gives \( b = a\cdot k \), reestablishing \( a \mid b \).
This manipulation reassures that rearranging elements carefully helps to prove statements efficiently and correctly.
First, from \( a \mid b \), there is an integer \( k \) such that \( b = a \cdot k \). Using algebraic manipulation, substitute \( b \) into the expression \( d\cdot b \), obtaining \( d\cdot a\cdot k \). This manipulation confirms \( d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b \).
Reversing, assume \( d\cdot a \mid d\cdot b \). It implies there exists an integer \( k \) such that \( d\cdot b = d\cdot a\cdot k \). Dividing both sides by \( d \) gives \( b = a\cdot k \), reestablishing \( a \mid b \).
This manipulation reassures that rearranging elements carefully helps to prove statements efficiently and correctly.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 2
Let \(n\) be a composite integer. Show that there exists a prime \(p\) dividing \(n,\) with \(p \leq n^{1 / 2}\).
View solution Problem 3
Let \(m\) be a positive integer. Show that for every real number \(x \geq 1\), the number of multiples of \(m\) in the interval \([1, x]\) is \(\lfloor x / m\rf
View solution Problem 4
Let \(x \in \mathbb{R}\). Show that \(2\lfloor x\rfloor \leq\lfloor 2 x\rfloor \leq 2\lfloor x\rfloor+1\).
View solution