Chapter 8
A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Mathematics · 10 exercises
Problem 1
Prove that positive numbers of the form \(3 k+1\) are equinumerous with positive numbers of the form \(4 k+2\).
6 step solution
Problem 2
Can a diagonalization proof showing that the interval (0,1) is uncount- able be made workable in base-3 (ternary) notation?
6 step solution
Problem 2
Let \(F\) be the collection of all real-valued functions defined on the real line. Find an injection from \(\mathbb{R}\) to \(F\). Do you think it is possible to find an injection going the other way? In other words, do you think that \(F\) and \(\mathbb{R}\) are equivalent? Explain.
5 step solution
Problem 2
Prove that \(f(x)=c+\frac{(x-a)(d-c)}{(b-a)}\) provides a bijection from the interval \([a, b]\) to the interval \([c, d]\)
4 step solution
Problem 2
Prove that set equivalence is an equivalence relation.
5 step solution
Problem 3
In the proof of Cantor's theorem we construct a set \(S\) that cannot be in the image of a presumed bijection from \(A\) to \(\mathcal{P}(A)\). Suppose \(A=\\{1,2,3\\}\) and \(\mathrm{f}\) determines the following correspondences: \(1 \longleftrightarrow \emptyset\) \(2 \longleftrightarrow\\{1,3\\}\) and \(3 \longleftrightarrow\\{1,2,3\\}\). What is \(S ?\)
3 step solution
Problem 3
Prove that any two circles are equinumerous (as sets of points).
6 step solution
Problem 4
An argument very similar to the one embodied in the proof of Can- tor's theorem is found in the Barber's paradox. This paradox was originally introduced in the popular press in order to give laypeople an understanding of Cantor's theorem and Russell's paradox. It sounds somewhat sexist to modern ears. (For example, it is presumed without comment that the Barber is male.) In a small town there is a Barber who shaves those men (and only those men) who do not shave themselves. Who shaves the Barber? Explain the similarity to the proof of Cantor's theorem.
3 step solution
Problem 4
Determine a formula for the bijection from (-1,1) to the line \(y=1\) determined by vertical projection onto the upper half of the unit circle, followed by projection from the point (0,0) .
4 step solution
Problem 6
Verify that the final deduction in the proof of Cantor's theorem, " \((y \in\) \(S \Longrightarrow y \notin S) \wedge(y \notin S \Longrightarrow y \in S), "\) is truly a contradiction.
5 step solution