Q4.6-38PE
Question
Unreasonable Results
(a) Repeat Exercise 4.29, but assume an acceleration of 1.20 m/s2 is produced. (b) What is unreasonable about the result?
(c) Which premise is unreasonable, and why is it unreasonable?
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified(a) -260 N
(b) The result is unreasonable because the force of friction can never be in the direction of motion.
(c) The unreasonable premise is that the acceleration of 1.20 m/s2 can be produced.
- The net force acting on the system = 1900 N.
- The sum of the boat's mass and the mass of the trailer = 700 kg.
- mc is the mass of the car = 1100 kg.
- a is the acceleration = 1.20 m/s2.
Apply Newton’s second law of motion as:
…………. (i)
Here, Fnet is the net force acting on the system, mb is the mass of the boat, mt is the mass of the trailer, mc is the mass of the car, a is the acceleration, F is the force exerted by the car, and f is the resistance force.
Substitute 700 kg for (mb+mt), 1100 kg for mc, 1900 N for F, and 1.20 m/s2 for a in equation (i), and we get,
Hence, the total resistance force is -260 N.
The result is unreasonable because the force of friction can never be in the direction of motion. It's always in the opposite direction.
The unreasonable premise is that an acceleration of 1.20 m/s2 can be produced.