Q41.
Question
41. WRITING IN MATH Answer the question that was posed at the beginning of the lesson.
How do inequalities apply to fantasy football?
Include the following in your answer:
- An inequality, and an explanation on how you obtained it, to represent a good game for Randy Moss in Dana’s fantasy football league,
- A graph of your inequality (remember that the number of touchdowns cannot be negative, but receiving yardage can be), and
- Which of the games in statistics in the table qualify as good games.
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedThe inequality which represents a good game for Randy Moss in Dana’s fantasy football league is , where is the number of receiving yards that Moss gets in a game and is the number of touchdowns that Moss scores in a game.
The graph of this inequality is given as:
Out of the three games whose statistics are given in the table, only Game 1 is a good game.
An inequality is an algebraic expression with one or more variables, containing one of the symbols;
A receiving yard is worth 5 points, a touchdown is worth 100 points and a game with 1000 points or more is considered to be a good game.
The statistics of 3 games is given as:
Let be the number of receiving yards that Moss gets in a game and be the number of touchdowns that Moss scores in a game.
Since each receiving yard is worth 5 points and each touchdown is worth 100 points, the total points earned in a game is evaluated as .
It is given that a game in which 1000 points or more are earned is a good game. Then, by the problem, a game is a good game if .
This is the required inequality.
It is obvious that the number of touchdowns cannot be negative. So, . However, receiving yardage may be negative or positive. So, there is no restriction on .
Graph the obtained inequality with the restriction as follows:
It is clear, from the table that for Game 1, and .
Put and in the obtained inequality to get,
This implies that the given inequality is true for and . Thus, Game 1 is a good game.
Similarly, from the table, for Game 2, and .
Put and in the obtained inequality to get,
This is a contradiction and thus implies that the given inequality is false for and . So, Game 2 is not a good game.
Finally, from the table, for Game 3, and .
Put and in the obtained inequality to get,
This is a contradiction and thus implies that the given inequality is false for and . So, Game 3 is also not a good game.
Thus, only Game 1 is a good game.