Q.27
Question
Prove that if for all , then and are uncorrelated; give a counterexample to show that the converse is not true.
Hint: Prove and use the fact that .
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
We prove that, for all
1Step 1: Given information
Given in the question that, we have to prove that for all
2Step 2: Explanation
Let's find the covariance between and . We have that
Since we have that for all es, we have that
Which implies
Hence
3Step 3: Disapprove the converse
Now, let's disapprove the converse. Consider random variable and define . We have that
Observe that is symmetric around zero, so . Finally, we see that . But, we have that
which is not obviously equal to constant .
4Step 4: Final answer
We prove that, for all
And from the above example we prove that
Other exercises in this chapter
Q.25
Show that if X and Y are independent, thenE[X∣Y=y]=E[X] for all y(a) in the discrete case;(b) in the continuous case.
View solution Q.26
Prove that E[g(X)Y∣X]=g(X)E[Y∣X].
View solution Q.28
Show that Cov(X,E[Y∣X])=Cov(X,Y).
View solution Q.29
Let X1,…,Xn be independent and identically distributed random variables. FindEX1∣X1+⋯+Xn=x
View solution