Q. 9.87
Question
Serving Time. According to the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research of Australia, as reported on Lawlink, the mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Australia is months. One hundred randomly selected motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Sydney. Australia, had a mean length of imprisonment of months. At the significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Sydney differs from the national mean in Australia? Assume that the population standard deviation of the lengths of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Sydney is months.
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedThe information does not get enough information to infer that the mean duration of sentence of motor vehicle theft offenders differentiates from of the nation mean in at the level of significance.
Let be the average sentence duration for motor vehicle theft offenses.
For a reason,
months populations standard deviation
The theories must be tested.
months
months
We'll run the test at a significance threshold of , or .
is the sample size.
months, arithmetic mean.
Statistical test,
The crucial values are because the test is a two-tailed test with .
A regression line is or in this case.
i.e., or
Perhaps or (Actually in fact )
As that of the amount of a statistical test,, doesn't really fall as in rejection zone, we need not reject at the significance level.
The records may not provide credible evidence to infer that its average duration of sentence for motor vehicle theft offenses varies first from nation mean in just at level of significance.