Q. 9.87
Question
According to the Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research of Australia, as reported on Lawlink, the mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Australia is 16.7 months. One hundred randomly selected motor-vehicle-theft of-fenders in Sydney, Australia, had a mean length of imprisonment of 17.8 months. At the 5% significance level, do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Sydney differs from the national mean in Australia? Assume that the population standard deviation of the lengths of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in Sydney is 6months.
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedAt 5% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean length of imprisonment of motor-vehicle-theft offenders differs from the national mean.
Consider the given question,
Population standard deviation is 6 months.
Sample size, n is 100.
Sample mean is is 17.8 months.
Assume to be the mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders.
We have to test the hypotheses,
On performing the test at 5% level of significance, i.e., .
Test statistics
As the test is two tailed test with is 0.05, the critical values are .
Here, the rejection region is , i.e.,
Here, .
Therefore, we do not reject at 5% level of significance as the value of the test statistic, z does not falls in the rejection region.
Hence, at 5% significance level, the data do not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean length of imprisonment of motor-vehicle-theft offenders differs from the national mean.