Problem 9
Question
A factory produces links for heavy metal chains. The research lab of the factory models the length (in \(\mathrm{cm}\) ) of a link by the random variable \(X\), with expected value \(\mathrm{E}[X]=5\) and variance \(\operatorname{Var}(X)=0.04\). The length of a link is defined in such a way that the length of a chain is equal to the sum of the lengths of its links. The factory sells chains of 50 meters; to be on the safe side 1002 links are used for such chains. The factory guarantees that the chain is not shorter than 50 meters. If by chance a chain is too short, the customer is reimbursed, and a new chain is given for free. a. Give an estimate of the probability that for a chain of at least 50 meters more than 1002 links are needed. For what percentage of the chains does the factory have to reimburse clients and provide free chains? b. The sales department of the factory notices that it has to hand out a lot of free chains and asks the research lab what is wrong. After further investigations the research lab reports to the sales department that the expectation value 5 is incorrect, and that the correct value is \(4.99(\mathrm{~cm})\). Do you think that it was necessary to report such a minor change of this value?
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Probability Distribution
- Probability distributions can be discrete or continuous. Discrete distributions have specific values (like rolling dice), while continuous ones cover a range (like measuring time or weight).
- In our problem, we deal with a continuous distribution because link lengths are measured on a continuous scale, in centimeters.
Expected Value
- The expected value is calculated as the sum of all possible values of a random variable, each multiplied by its probability of occurrence.
- In the chain link scenario, the expected value of each link length was initially given as 5 cm.
When it was discovered that the actual expected value is slightly less, at 4.99 cm, this small change significantly impacted the overall expected length of the entire 1002-link chain due to the scaling effect. This is a striking example of how small errors in expected values can be magnified over large quantities.
Variance
- The formula for variance is \( \operatorname{Var}(X) = E[(X - E[X])^2] \), which takes the average of the squared deviations from the mean.
- For our problem, the variance of each link's length is 0.04 cm².
Lower variance means the lengths are more consistent, while higher variance indicates more fluctuation. Variance plays a crucial role in applying the Central Limit Theorem, which allows us to use normal distribution properties for sums of random variables like our chain links.
z-score
- Calculating a z-score involves subtracting the mean from the data point and dividing by the standard deviation: \( z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma} \).
- In our example, the z-score helps determine the probability that a chain will not meet the required length.
However, with the corrected expected length of 4.99 cm, the z-score shifted, resulting in a much higher probability of 44% that the chain would be insufficient. This illustrates how sensitive z-scores and probabilities are to changes in the mean or standard deviation, impacting practical outcomes like reimbursements.