Problem 89
Question
\(89-90 .\) BUSINESS: The Rule of .6 Many chemical and refining companies use "the rule of point six" to estimate the cost of new equipment. According to this rule, if a piece of equipment (such as a storage tank) originally cost C dollars, then the cost of similar equipment that is \(x\) times as large will be approximately \(x^{06} \mathrm{C}\) dollars. For example, if the original equipment cost \(C\) dollars, then new equipment with twice the capacity of the old equipment \((x=2)\) would cost \(2^{0.6} \mathrm{C}=1.516 \mathrm{C}\) dollars - that is, about 1.5 times as much. Therefore, to increase capacity by \(100 \%\) costs only about \(50 \%\) more. \({ }^{*}\) Use the rule of .6 to find how costs change if a company wants to quadruple \((x=4)\) its capacity. "Although the rule of .6 is only a rough "rule of thumb," it can be somewhat justified on the basis that the equipment of such industries consists mainly of containers, and the cost of a container depends on its surface area (square units), which increases more slowly than its capacity (cubic units)
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Rule of .6
This is expressed mathematically as: if the original cost is \( C \), then the cost for equipment \( x \) times larger than the original is approximately \( x^{0.6} \times C \). This provides a cost function where the exponent \( 0.6 \) indicates that costs rise at a decelerating rate when compared to size.
- For instance, doubling the size increases the cost by about 1.5 times (\(2^{0.6} \times C\)), not double.
- This rule helps to quickly estimate the expenses involved in upgrading equipment without detailed calculations.
Understanding this rule can be crucial when budget planning for scaling operations as it encapsulates the economic perspective of larger investments.
Equipment Sizing
The actual capacity a production unit can handle is directly tied to its size, which in many industries means its volume. If the equipment's volume doubles, its ability to store, process, or produce also doubles. However, the cost does not. Hence, using the rule of .6, companies can make informed predictions about how equipment scaling will financially impact them.
- Sizing up equipment often demands more than just doubling the factory floor space.
- Considerations include logistics, space utilization, labor needs, and potential downtime during installation.
Analyzing these factors allows companies to strategically manage physical scaling without exceeding budget limits.
Cost Scaling
For example, if a company's current equipment handles 100 units and expansion requires equipment for 400 units, according to the rule of .6:
- The scaling factor is 4 (quadrupling).
- The increase in cost is given by \(4^{0.6}\) or about 2.297 times the original cost.
This calculation provides a realistic estimation of new investments, emphasizing that cost scaling is not merely a direct multiplication of current spending but rather a scaled measure reflecting inherent economic efficiencies of larger operations.
Surface Area vs Volume
- The surface area increases by the square of the scale factor when dimensions increase, while volume increases by the cube.
- This means that as equipment is scaled up, the surface area (and thus the material cost) increases more slowly compared to the volume.
This discrepancy is why the cost curve flattens (due to relying more on surface area than volume), justifying why the rule uses \(0.6\) rather than \(1\) as an exponent. It reflects the practical economic impact where increasing the size yields diminishing cost proportionality.