Problem 88
Question
In a certain region, a charge distribution exists that is spherically symmetric but nonuniform. That is, the volume charge density \(\rho(r)\) depends on the distance \(r\) from the center of the distribution but not on the spherical polar angles \(\theta\) and \(\phi .\) The electric potential \(V(r)\) due to this charge distribution is $$V(r)=\left\\{\begin{array}{l}{\frac{\rho_{0} a^{2}}{18 \epsilon_{0}}\left[1-3\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^{2}+2\left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^{3}\right] \text { for } r \leq a} \\ {0} & {\text { for } r \geq a}\end{array}\right.$$ where \(\rho_{0}\) is a constant having units of \(\mathrm{C} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) and \(a\) is a constant having units of meters. (a) Derive expressions for \(\vec{E}\) for the regions \(r \leq a\) and \(r \geq a .[\)Hint\(:\) Use Eq. \((23.23) .]\) Explain why \(\vec{\boldsymbol{E}}\) has only a radial component. (b) Derive an expression for \(\rho(r)\) in each of the two regions \(r \leq a\) and \(r \geq a .[\)Hint t: Use Gauss's law for two spherical shells, one of radius \(r\) and the other of radius \(r+d r .\) The charge contained in the infinitesimal spherical shell of radius \(d r\) is \(d q=4 \pi r^{2} \rho(r) d r . ](c)\) Show that the net charge contained in the volume of a sphere of radius greater than or equal to \(a\) is zero. [Hint: Integrate the expressions derived in part (b) for \(\rho(r)\) over a spherical volume of radius greater than or equal to \(a.\)) Is this result consistent with the electric field for \(r>a\) that you calculated in part (a)?
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Electric Field Derivation
To find \( \vec{E} \), we use the relationship \( \vec{E} = - abla V(r) \), where \( V(r) \) is the electric potential. In the region \( r \leq a \), the given potential is a function of \( r \), allowing us to derive the electric field by calculating the derivative of \( V(r) \) with respect to \( r \). This results in an electric field that has only a radial component due to the symmetry of the potential function.
For \( r \geq a \), the potential \( V(r) \) is zero, indicating that the electric field is also zero outside this region. This consistent result showcases the confined nature of the charge within the specified sphere.
Spherical Symmetry
This symmetry simplifies the study of electric fields and potentials, as it means that the solutions are naturally uniform across any surface at a constant \( r \). The radial nature of the electric field arises from this symmetry, simplifying both theoretical derivations and practical calculations.
Understanding spherical symmetry helps predict how the electric field and potential change across different regions, making problems involving spherical charge distributions more manageable.
Gauss's Law
In our spherical charge distribution, we apply Gauss's Law to a spherical surface of radius \( r \). For \( r \leq a \), the law helps us relate the electric field to the charge density \( \rho(r) \) using the formula \( abla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac{\rho(r)}{\epsilon_0} \). This approach quickly reveals the form of \( \rho(r) \) and confirms the electric field behavior derived earlier.
Applying Gauss's Law to the region \( r \geq a \) further confirms that the electric field is zero, as no additional charge exists beyond this radius.
Electric Potential
In our specified region \( r \leq a \), \( V(r) \) involves polynomial expressions that reflect the non-uniformity of the charge distribution. The form of \( V(r) \) directly affects the derived electric field, as it requires taking the gradient, leading to the function for \( \vec{E} \).
For \( r \geq a \), the potential quickly drops to zero, indicating that outside this radius, the effects of the charge distribution vanish. Understanding the potential function's behavior is critical in predicting the impact of spherical charge distributions in various physical contexts.
Charge Density Calculations
For \( r \leq a \), using Gauss's Law, we can express \( \rho(r) \) in terms of the electric field by recognizing \( abla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac{\rho(r)}{\epsilon_0} \). This calculation necessitates connecting the charge density with the derived electric field, revealing the specific behavior and contribution of \( \rho(r) \) to the overall field distribution.
For \( r \geq a \), since both the electric field and potential are zero, it follows that \( \rho(r) = 0 \). Showing that no charge density exists in this region is consistent with our understanding of confined charge systems. Calculating \( \rho(r) \) not only confirms the physical insights but also validates our boundary conditions and overall problem-solving approach.