Problem 83
Question
Consider the stable elements through lead \((Z=82)\). In how many instances are the atomic weights of the elements in the reverse order relative to the atomic numbers of the elements? What is the explanation for these cases?
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
In short, there are two instances where the atomic weights of stable elements up to lead (Z=82) are in reverse order relative to their atomic numbers:
1. Argon (Ar) \(Z=18\) and Potassium (K) \(Z=19\)
2. Cobalt (Co) \(Z=27\) and Nickel (Ni) \(Z=28\)
The explanation for these instances is due to isotopic abundance, as the atomic weight of an element is a weighted average of the naturally occurring isotopes' masses of the element. In both cases, the relative abundances of the heavier isotope for the lighter element are higher than for the heavier element, resulting in the overall atomic weight being higher for the element with a lower atomic number and lower for the element with a higher atomic number.
1Step 1: Understand Atomic Weight and Atomic Number
Atomic number (Z) is the number of protons in the nucleus of an atom, and it determines the element's place in the periodic table. Atomic weight is the weighted average mass of the naturally occurring isotopes of an element. It should be noted that the atomic weight of an element will always be greater than or equal to its atomic number, as it is the mass of protons and neutrons combined.
2Step 2: Identify the Stable Elements up to Lead (Z=82)
A stable element is one that does not undergo radioactive decay. In this exercise, we shall consider elements up to lead (Z=82), which is the heaviest stable element. We will have to analyze the atomic weights and atomic numbers of these elements.
3Step 3: Compare Atomic Weights and Atomic Numbers for the Elements
In order to find the instances where the atomic weights of the stable elements are in reverse order relative to the atomic numbers, we have to compare and analyze both quantities for these elements. We need to find instances where the element with a higher atomic number has a lower atomic weight than the element with a lower atomic number.
4Step 4: Identify the Instances Where Atomic Weights Are in Reverse Order
There are two instances where the atomic weights of consecutive elements are in reverse order relative to their atomic numbers:
1. Argon (Ar) \(Z=18\) and Potassium (K) \(Z=19\).
2. Cobalt (Co) \(Z=27\) and Nickel (Ni) \(Z=28\).
In both these cases, the atomic weight of the element with a higher atomic number is less than that of the element with a lower atomic number.
5Step 5: Explain the Reason for These Instances
The explanation for the reverse order in atomic weights relative to the atomic numbers is due to isotopic abundance. The atomic weight of an element is not an integer number, as it is a weighted average of the naturally occurring isotopes' masses of an element. In both instances mentioned above, the relative abundances of the heavier isotope for the lighter element are higher than for the heavier element. This results in the overall atomic weight being higher for the element with a lower atomic number and lower for the element with a higher atomic number.
In conclusion, there are two instances where the atomic weights of stable elements up to lead are in reverse order relative to their atomic numbers, and the reason for this is due to the isotopic abundance of the elements involved.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 81
Write a balanced equation for the reaction that occurs in each of the following cases: (a) Ozone decomposes to dioxygen. (b) Xenon reacts with fluorine. (Write
View solution Problem 82
Write a balanced equation for the reaction that occurs in each of the following cases: (a) Chlorine reacts with water. (b) Barium metal is heated in an atmosphe
View solution Problem 84
(a) Which will have the lower energy, a 4 s or a \(4 p\) electron in an As atom? (b) How can we use the concept of effective nuclear charge to explain your answ
View solution Problem 85
(a) If the core electrons were totally effective at shielding the valence electrons and the valence electrons provided no shielding for each other, what would b
View solution