Problem 77
Question
For a number of years, it was not clear whether mercury(I) ions existed in solution as \(\mathrm{Hg}^{+}\) or as \(\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}\). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we could set up the following system: $$ \operatorname{Hg}(l) \mid \text { soln } \mathrm{A} \| \operatorname{soln} \mathrm{B} \mid \operatorname{Hg}(l)$$ where soln A contained 0.263 g mercury(I) nitrate per liter and soln B contained \(2.63 \mathrm{~g}\) mercury(I) nitrate per liter. If the measured emf of such a cell is \(0.0289 \mathrm{~V}\) at \(18^{\circ} \mathrm{C},\) what can you deduce about the nature of the mercury(I) ions?
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Mercury(I) ions exist as \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) in solution.
1Step 1: Understand the System
This electrochemical cell is set up with solutions containing mercury(I) nitrate at different concentrations. We need to determine if mercury exists in the solution as \( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \) or \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \). We use the given EMF to make this determination.
2Step 2: Identify Nernst Equation for the Situation
The Nernst equation relates the cell potential to the concentration of ions: \[ E = E^0 - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q \]Where \(E\) is the cell potential, \(E^0\) is the standard cell potential, \(R\) is the gas constant, \(T\) is the temperature in Kelvin, \(n\) is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the reaction, \(F\) is Faraday's constant, and \(Q\) is the reaction quotient.
3Step 3: Calculate Reaction Quotient (Q)
For mercury(I) in solution as \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \), the potential difference would be due to the concentration difference. First, calculate the molarity of \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) for solution A and B from their given mass concentrations.
4Step 4: Calculate Molarity from Mass
Molar mass of \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2} \mathrm{(NO_3)_2} \) is approximately 525.2 g/mol. Molarity for solution A is \( \frac{0.263 \text{ g/L}}{525.2 \text{ g/mol}} \approx 0.0005 \text{ mol/L} \). Similar calculation for solution B gives \( \frac{2.63 \text{ g/L}}{525.2 \text{ g/mol}} \approx 0.005 \text{ mol/L} \).
5Step 5: Calculate the EMF using the Nernst Equation
Assume the reaction is \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}(aq) + 2e^- \leftrightarrow 2 \mathrm{Hg}(l) \),with \( n = 2 \). Calculate \( Q = \frac{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}(A)]}{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+}(B)]} \). Substitute these values into Nernst equation:\[ 0.0289 = 0 - \frac{RT}{2F} \ln \left( \frac{0.0005}{0.005} \right) \]
6Step 6: Solve the Nernst Equation for Confirmation
Convert temperature: \( T = 18^{\circ} \mathrm{C} = 291 \text{ K} \). Using \[ R = 8.314 \text{ J/(mol K)}, F = 96500 \text{ C/mol} \], we get:\[ 0.0289 \text{ V} = - \frac{8.314 \times 291}{2 \times 96500} \ln(0.1) \]. This gives an approximate match, supporting the reaction involving \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \).
7Step 7: Conclusion
Given that the calculations using \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) provide a reasonable match with the experimental EMF, we conclude that mercury(I) ions exist as \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) in solution, and not as \( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \).
Key Concepts
Electrochemical CellMercury(I) IonsReaction QuotientStandard Cell Potential
Electrochemical Cell
An electrochemical cell is a device that can generate electrical energy from chemical reactions or facilitate chemical reactions through the introduction of electrical energy. Within this setup, two half-cells are connected by a salt bridge or a porous separator, allowing ions to flow between them to maintain electrical neutrality.
The system in our case study involves mercury and mercury(I) nitrate solutions at different concentrations. By measuring the electromotive force (emf) or potential difference between these two solutions, we gain insights about the species present in the solutions, specifically mercury(I) ions. Here, the cell design helps us differentiate whether mercury(I) exists as solitary ions (\( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \)) or in a dimer form (\( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \)).
The system in our case study involves mercury and mercury(I) nitrate solutions at different concentrations. By measuring the electromotive force (emf) or potential difference between these two solutions, we gain insights about the species present in the solutions, specifically mercury(I) ions. Here, the cell design helps us differentiate whether mercury(I) exists as solitary ions (\( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \)) or in a dimer form (\( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \)).
- One half-cell contains a more concentrated solution of mercury(I) nitrate, while the other has a less concentrated solution.
- The electrode potential difference is due to the concentration gradient of the mercury(I) ions.
Mercury(I) Ions
Mercury(I) ions have sparked interest due to their uncommon charge and bonding configuration. Often, there is confusion about their form in solution, begging the question of whether they exist as monomeric ions \( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \) or as dimers \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \). In the latter form, two mercury atoms share electrons, forming a diatomic cation.
The structure \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) is stabilized by a pair bond between the two mercury atoms. This results in a reduction in overall energy, making it a more common form in mercury(I) compounds. Experimental setups, such as the electrochemical cell described, help in confirming the molecular identity.
The structure \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) is stabilized by a pair bond between the two mercury atoms. This results in a reduction in overall energy, making it a more common form in mercury(I) compounds. Experimental setups, such as the electrochemical cell described, help in confirming the molecular identity.
- Dimer form: \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \)
- More stable - Monomer form: \( \mathrm{Hg}^{+} \)
- Less common due to instability
Reaction Quotient
The reaction quotient, often denoted as \( Q \), is a quantitative measure that reflects the relative concentrations of reactants and products involved in a chemical reaction at any given moment. It helps predict the direction in which the reaction will proceed to reach equilibrium.
In the case of differing mercury(I) nitrate concentrations between two solutions, the reaction quotient is derived from these concentrations. For the assumed dimeric presence of \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \):
\[ Q = \frac{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} (\text{solution A})]}{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} (\text{solution B})]} \]
The value of \( Q \) changes based on concentration differences, influencing the cell potential as described by the Nernst Equation. When calculations match observed potentials, it confirms the stoichiometry of the ions involved.
In the case of differing mercury(I) nitrate concentrations between two solutions, the reaction quotient is derived from these concentrations. For the assumed dimeric presence of \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \):
\[ Q = \frac{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} (\text{solution A})]}{[\mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} (\text{solution B})]} \]
The value of \( Q \) changes based on concentration differences, influencing the cell potential as described by the Nernst Equation. When calculations match observed potentials, it confirms the stoichiometry of the ions involved.
- The closer \( Q \) is to the equilibrium constant \( K \), the closer the reaction is to equilibrium.
- Dramatic changes in \( Q \) can induce shifts in the reaction direction.
Standard Cell Potential
The standard cell potential \( E^0 \) is a crucial concept in electrochemistry, representing the maximum voltage difference between two half-cells when concentrations of all species are at their standard states (usually 1 M concentration, 1 atm pressure, and 25°C temperature). It is the reference point for potentials in the Nernst equation that describe non-standard conditions.
In the provided electrochemical cell description, although no specific \( E^0 \) was given for \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \), it serves as a benchmark.
The measurement of \( 0.0289 \, \mathrm{V} \) relates to how far the system diverges from standard state potentials:
\[ E = E^0 - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q \]
Even a small emf can testify to significant concentration discrepancies. By comparing experimental potential changes to theoretical predictions, conclusions about molecular arrangements can be drawn, such as deducing that \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) is the prevalent form in the solution.
In the provided electrochemical cell description, although no specific \( E^0 \) was given for \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \), it serves as a benchmark.
The measurement of \( 0.0289 \, \mathrm{V} \) relates to how far the system diverges from standard state potentials:
\[ E = E^0 - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q \]
Even a small emf can testify to significant concentration discrepancies. By comparing experimental potential changes to theoretical predictions, conclusions about molecular arrangements can be drawn, such as deducing that \( \mathrm{Hg}_{2}^{2+} \) is the prevalent form in the solution.
- \( E^0 \) values provide comparative insights between different ionic species.
- A positive \( E^0 \) indicates a spontaneous reaction under standard conditions.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 75
Calculate the emf of the following concentration cell at $$ \begin{array}{l} 25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}: \\ \quad \mathrm{Cu}(s)\left|\mathrm{C} \mathrm{u}^{2+}(0.08
View solution Problem 76
The cathode reaction in the Leclanché cell is given by: $$ 2 \mathrm{MnO}_{2}(s)+\mathrm{Zn}^{2+}(a q)+2 e^{-} \longrightarrow \mathrm{ZnMn}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{4}(
View solution Problem 80
Describe an experiment that would enable you to determine which is the cathode and which is the anode in a galvanic cell using copper and zinc electrodes.
View solution Problem 81
An acidified solution was electrolyzed using copper electrodes. A constant current of 1.18 A caused the anode to lose \(0.584 \mathrm{~g}\) after \(1.52 \times
View solution