Problem 7
Question
Give inductive proofs of the following $$ \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, 4 \mid\left(13^{n}+4 n-1\right) $$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Since the base case is true and the inductive step has been proven, the statement holds for all natural numbers.
1Step 1: Base Case
Check the base case where n = 0. Substitute n = 0 into the expression to verify whether it is divisible by 4. \[ 13^0 + 4 \times 0 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0 \] Since 0 is divisible by 4, the base case is true.
2Step 2: Inductive Hypothesis
Assume the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number k, i.e., \[ 4 \bigg| \big(13^k + 4k - 1\big) \] This means there exists some integer m such that,\[ 13^k + 4k - 1 = 4m \]
3Step 3: Inductive Step
Prove that the statement is true for k + 1 based on the inductive hypothesis. Consider \[ 13^{k+1} + 4(k+1) - 1 \]Rewrite using the properties of exponents and combine like terms: \[ 13^{k+1} + 4k + 4 - 1 = 13 \times 13^k + 4k + 3 \]Using the inductive hypothesis, substitute \( 13^k = 4m - 4k + 1 \):\[ 13 \times (4m - 4k + 1) + 4k + 3 \ = 52m - 52k + 13 + 4k + 3 \ = 52m - 48k + 16 \]Since both terms are clearly divisible by 4, we can conclude \[ 13^{k+1} + 4(k+1) - 1 = 4(13m - 12k + 4) \]Thus, the proof holds for k + 1.
4Step 4: Conclusion
By mathematical induction, since the base case holds true and the inductive step has been proven, the given statement is true for all natural numbers n. Hence, \( \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, 4 | (13^n + 4n - 1) \).
Key Concepts
Base CaseInductive HypothesisInductive StepMathematical Induction
Base Case
In mathematical induction, we start with the base case. This is where we verify that the given statement is true for the smallest possible value of the natural number n.
For our example, the base case checks when n=0:
Substitute n=0 into the expression \(13^{0} + 4 \times 0 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0\).
Since 0 is divisible by 4, the base case is satisfied.
This step is crucial as it establishes the initial truth of our statement before we move on to larger values of n.
For our example, the base case checks when n=0:
Substitute n=0 into the expression \(13^{0} + 4 \times 0 - 1 = 1 - 1 = 0\).
Since 0 is divisible by 4, the base case is satisfied.
This step is crucial as it establishes the initial truth of our statement before we move on to larger values of n.
Inductive Hypothesis
The inductive hypothesis involves assuming that the given statement is true for some arbitrary natural number k. This is not a proof yet but rather a stepping stone.
For our example, we assume the statement \(4 \bigg| \big(13^k + 4k - 1\big)\) is true for some integer k.
This assumption means that there exists an integer m such that \(13^k + 4k - 1 = 4m\).
The inductive hypothesis allows us to use this assumed truth to try and prove the statement for the next integer, k+1.
This logical step sets us up for the final part of the proof, showing continuity.
For our example, we assume the statement \(4 \bigg| \big(13^k + 4k - 1\big)\) is true for some integer k.
This assumption means that there exists an integer m such that \(13^k + 4k - 1 = 4m\).
The inductive hypothesis allows us to use this assumed truth to try and prove the statement for the next integer, k+1.
This logical step sets us up for the final part of the proof, showing continuity.
Inductive Step
Here, we need to prove that if the statement holds for some integer k, then it must also hold for k+1. This step solidifies our hypothesis and extends the truth to the next case.
Using our example, we need to prove that \(13^{k+1} + 4(k+1) - 1\) is divisible by 4.
First, rewrite the expression: \(13^{k+1} + 4k + 4 - 1 = 13 \times 13^k + 4k + 3\).
Next, use the inductive hypothesis where \(13^k = 4m - 4k + 1\): \(13 \times (4m - 4k + 1) + 4k + 3 = 52m - 52k + 13 + 4k + 3 = 52m - 48k + 16\).
Since all the terms in the final expression are divisible by 4, we confirm that the initial statement holds for k+1.
Using our example, we need to prove that \(13^{k+1} + 4(k+1) - 1\) is divisible by 4.
First, rewrite the expression: \(13^{k+1} + 4k + 4 - 1 = 13 \times 13^k + 4k + 3\).
Next, use the inductive hypothesis where \(13^k = 4m - 4k + 1\): \(13 \times (4m - 4k + 1) + 4k + 3 = 52m - 52k + 13 + 4k + 3 = 52m - 48k + 16\).
Since all the terms in the final expression are divisible by 4, we confirm that the initial statement holds for k+1.
Mathematical Induction
Mathematical induction is a powerful proof technique used to prove statements about natural numbers. It consists of two main parts:
For our example, after succeeding in the base case and inductive step, we conclude \( \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, 4 \mid \left(13^{n}+4n-1\right)\). This means the original statement is true for all natural numbers n.
Mathematical induction bridges the gap between proving a statement for a single case and proving it for all cases.
- Base Case: Prove that the statement holds for the initial value, usually n=0 or n=1.
- Inductive Step: Show that if the statement holds for an arbitrary natural number n=k, it must also hold for n=k+1.
For our example, after succeeding in the base case and inductive step, we conclude \( \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, 4 \mid \left(13^{n}+4n-1\right)\). This means the original statement is true for all natural numbers n.
Mathematical induction bridges the gap between proving a statement for a single case and proving it for all cases.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 6
Give inductive proofs of the following $$ \forall n \in \mathbb{N}, 5 \mid\left(n^{5}-5 n^{3}+14 n\right) $$
View solution Problem 6
Prove \(\sum_{j=0}^{n}(4 j+1)=2 n^{2}+3 n+1\) for all integers \(n \geq 0\).
View solution Problem 7
Prove \(\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{(2 i-1)(2 i+1)}=\frac{n}{2 n+1}\) for all natural numbers \(n\).
View solution Problem 8
The Fibonacci numbers are a sequence of integers defined by the rule that a number in the sequence is the sum of the two that precede it. $$ F_{n+2}=F_{n}+F_{n+
View solution