Problem 64
Question
Draw the crystal-field energy-level diagrams and show the placement of electrons for the following complexes: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-},\) (b) \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\) | (a high-spin complex) \((\mathbf{c})\left[\mathrm{Ru}(\mathrm{bipy})_{3}\right]^{3+}\) (a low-spin complex), \((\mathbf{d})\left[\mathrm{NiCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\) (tetrahedral), ( e) \(\left[\mathrm{PtBr}_{6}\right]^{2-},(\mathbf{f})\left[\mathrm{Ti}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{2+}\).
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
For the given complex ions, their geometries, d-electron configuration, and crystal-field energy-level diagrams are as follows:
(a) \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-}\): Octahedral, d²
\[
\uparrow\downarrow \quad _{ (t_{2g)} }\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\quad\uparrow\quad_{e_g}
\]
(b) \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\): Octahedral, high-spin d⁵
\[
\uparrow\downarrow \quad _{ (t_{2g)} }\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\quad\uparrow\quad\uparrow\quad_{e_g}
\]
(c) \(\left[\mathrm{Ru}(\mathrm{bipy})_{3}\right]^{3+}\): Octahedral, low-spin d⁶
\[
\uparrow\downarrow \quad _{ (t_{2g)} }\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad_{e_g}
\]
(d) \(\left[\mathrm{NiCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\): Tetrahedral, d⁸
\[
\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\quad_{t_{2}}
\]
(e) \(\left[\mathrm{PtBr}_{6}\right]^{2-}\): Square planar, dsp²
\[
\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad_{d_{x^2 - y^2}}\quad \uparrow\downarrow\quad_{d_{z^2}}
\]
(f) \(\left[\mathrm{Ti}(\mathrm{en})_{3}\right]^{2+}\): Octahedral, d¹
\[
\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\quad_{(t_{2g)}}
\]
1Step 1: Identify given information
From the problem: Draw the crystal-field energy-level diagrams and show the placement of electrons for the following complexes: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-},\) (b) \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\) | (a high-spin complex) \((\mathbf{c})\left[\mathrm{Ru}(\mathrm{bipy})_{3}\right]^{3+}\) (a low-spin complex), \((\mathbf{d})\left[\mathrm{NiCl}_{4}\righ
2Step 2: Determine what to find
We identify the unknown quantity in this Chemistry problem and select the appropriate approach.
3Step 3: Select the appropriate formula
Based on the given data and unknown, we choose the relevant equation from Chemistry.
4Step 4: Substitute values and solve
Substituting known values into the equation, we perform the calculation.
5Step 5: State the result
The result is: For the given complex ions, their geometries, d-electron configuration, and crystal-field energy-level diagrams are as follows: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-}\): Octahedral, d² \[ \uparrow\downarrow \quad _{ (t_{2g)} }\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\downarrow\quad\uparrow\quad\uparrow\quad_{e_g} \] (b) \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]
Key Concepts
d-Electron ConfigurationCoordination ComplexesCrystal Field Theory
d-Electron Configuration
Understanding the d-electron configuration is crucial in the study of transition metal complexes. Transition metals, the elements in the d-block of the periodic table, can have between one to ten electrons in their d subshells. These configurations are fundamental in predicting the chemical and physical properties of coordination complexes.
The number of d-electrons is determined by the oxidation state of the metal and its position in the periodic table. In coordination chemistry, we often ascribe an effective atomic number to the central metal ion, considering not just its own electrons but also those provided by its ligands. The total electron count includes the central metal's d-electrons plus the number of electrons donated by the ligands.
For instance, in a complex where iron has a +3 charge as in \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\), the d-electron configuration would be high-spin d⁵. The terms 'high-spin' and 'low-spin' refer to the energy gap between different sets of d-orbitals and whether the electrons will pair up in lower energy orbitals or occupy higher energy orbitals singly. Understanding the correct d-electron configuration of a complex enables one to predict magnetic properties, color, and reactivity.
The number of d-electrons is determined by the oxidation state of the metal and its position in the periodic table. In coordination chemistry, we often ascribe an effective atomic number to the central metal ion, considering not just its own electrons but also those provided by its ligands. The total electron count includes the central metal's d-electrons plus the number of electrons donated by the ligands.
For instance, in a complex where iron has a +3 charge as in \(\left[\mathrm{FeF}_{6}\right]^{3-}\), the d-electron configuration would be high-spin d⁵. The terms 'high-spin' and 'low-spin' refer to the energy gap between different sets of d-orbitals and whether the electrons will pair up in lower energy orbitals or occupy higher energy orbitals singly. Understanding the correct d-electron configuration of a complex enables one to predict magnetic properties, color, and reactivity.
Coordination Complexes
The coordination complexes consist of a central metal atom or ion which is surrounded by molecules or ions known as ligands. The ligands are donors of electron pairs, and their arrangement around the central metal atom is defined by the coordination geometry—common geometries include octahedral, tetrahedral, and square planar.
In the given exercise, the different geometries of the complexes have a profound impact on the d-electron configuration. The type of ligands (whether they are strong field or weak field) and their arrangement can greatly influence whether a complex is high-spin or low-spin. For example, halides like Cl⁻ tend to be weak field and thus favor high-spin complexes, as in \(\left[\mathrm{NiCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\) with a tetrahedral arrangement. On the other hand, chelating ligands like (en) are strong field and favor low-spin complexes, impacting the overall properties of the complexes such as magnetic behavior and spectroscopic signatures. Coordination complexes are fundamental in many biological systems and industrial processes, making their study essential in both biochemistry and applied chemistry.
In the given exercise, the different geometries of the complexes have a profound impact on the d-electron configuration. The type of ligands (whether they are strong field or weak field) and their arrangement can greatly influence whether a complex is high-spin or low-spin. For example, halides like Cl⁻ tend to be weak field and thus favor high-spin complexes, as in \(\left[\mathrm{NiCl}_{4}\right]^{2-}\) with a tetrahedral arrangement. On the other hand, chelating ligands like (en) are strong field and favor low-spin complexes, impacting the overall properties of the complexes such as magnetic behavior and spectroscopic signatures. Coordination complexes are fundamental in many biological systems and industrial processes, making their study essential in both biochemistry and applied chemistry.
Crystal Field Theory
The crystal field theory is a model that describes how the energy levels of d-orbitals are affected by the presence of ligands around the central metal ion in a complex. It explains the electron distribution within the d-orbitals and helps in predicting the magnetic and spectral properties of coordination complexes.
In crystal field theory, the d-orbitals split into different energy levels depending on the geometry of the complex. For an octahedral complex such as \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-}\), the d-orbitals split into two sets: the lower energy t2g and the higher energy eg. In contrast, for a tetrahedral complex, the energy split is reversed with eg being lower in energy.
The crystal-field energy-level diagrams are visual tools used to depict this orbital splitting and electron placement, providing insight into the complex's potential reactivity and color. Diagrams like those in the given exercise show at a glance whether a complex will be high-spin or low-spin and the consequent magnetic properties. Moreover, crystal field theory assists in understanding the impact of ligand field strength, which affects whether electrons will pair up in lower energy orbitals or occupy all orbitals singly before pairing.
In crystal field theory, the d-orbitals split into different energy levels depending on the geometry of the complex. For an octahedral complex such as \(\left[\mathrm{VCl}_{6}\right]^{3-}\), the d-orbitals split into two sets: the lower energy t2g and the higher energy eg. In contrast, for a tetrahedral complex, the energy split is reversed with eg being lower in energy.
The crystal-field energy-level diagrams are visual tools used to depict this orbital splitting and electron placement, providing insight into the complex's potential reactivity and color. Diagrams like those in the given exercise show at a glance whether a complex will be high-spin or low-spin and the consequent magnetic properties. Moreover, crystal field theory assists in understanding the impact of ligand field strength, which affects whether electrons will pair up in lower energy orbitals or occupy all orbitals singly before pairing.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 62
For each of the following metals, write the electronic configuration of the atom and its \(3+\) ion: (a) Fe, (b) Mo, (c) Co. Draw the crystal-field energy- leve
View solution Problem 63
Draw the crystal-field energy-level diagrams and show the placement of \(d\) electrons for each of the following: (a) \(\left[\mathrm{Cr}\left(\mathrm{H}_{2} \m
View solution Problem 65
The complex \(\left[\mathrm{Mn}\left(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\right)_{6}\right]^{2+}\) contains five unpaired electrons. Sketch the energy-level diagram for the \(d\) or
View solution Problem 66
The ion \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{3-}\) has one unpaired electron, whereas \(\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{NCS})_{6}\right]^{3-}\) has five unpai
View solution