Problem 64
Question
Among the following, the correct statement is (a) Between \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_{3}, \mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is a better electron donor because the lone pair of electrons occupies spherical \(s\)-orbital and is less directional (b) Between \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_{3}, \mathrm{PH}_{3}\) is a better electron donor because the lone pair of electrons occupies \(s p^{3}\) orbital and is more directional (c) Between \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_{3}, \mathrm{NH}_{3}\) is a better electron donor because the lone pair of electrons occupies \(s p^{3}\) orbital and is more directional (d) Between \(\mathrm{NH}_{3}\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_{3}, \mathrm{PH}_{3}\) is a better electron donor because the lone pair of electrons occupies spherical \(s\)-orbital and is less directional
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Hybridization
It involves the mixing of atomic orbitals to form new hybrid orbitals that are suitable for the pairing of electrons to form chemical bonds.
For example, in ammonia (\(\mathrm{NH}_3\)), nitrogen undergoes \(sp^3\) hybridization. This means that one \(s\) orbital and three \(p\) orbitals mix to create four equivalent \(sp^3\) hybrid orbitals.
These orbitals are arranged in a tetrahedral fashion, which provides a shape where electron pairs can be more directional.
In molecules like phosphine (\(\mathrm{PH}_3\)), phosphorus also shows \(sp^3\) hybridization.
Despite similarities in hybridization with \(\mathrm{NH}_3\), there are differences due to the size and electronegativity of the atom involved.
Understanding hybridization allows us to predict the shape and bond angles in molecules, which are critical for determining functionality in chemical reactions.
sp³ orbitals
This results in four new equivalent orbitals that are oriented in a tetrahedral geometry.
These orbitals are highly directional, promoting a better overlap with other atoms when forming bonds.
The directionality is important because it allows lone pairs of electrons, such as those in \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_3\), to effectively overlap and form strong bonds with electron acceptors.
The highly directional characteristic is one reason why \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) is a more effective electron donor than \(\mathrm{PH}_3\).
The lone pair in \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) resides in an \(sp^3\) orbital, making it readily available for bonding interactions.
This concept is particularly significant in understanding molecular interactions and reactivity.
Electronegativity
In the context of this exercise, nitrogen and phosphorus have different electronegativities, affecting their electron donor capabilities.
Nitrogen is more electronegative than phosphorus, meaning it tends to hold electrons more tightly.
However, despite its high electronegativity, the smaller size and focused electron density of \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) provide its lone pair greater accessibility compared to \(\mathrm{PH}_3\).
This relates back to its ability as an electron donor and emphasizes the importance of considering both electronegativity and atomic size in chemical bonding.
Understanding electronegativity helps predict how different atoms will interact in a molecule.
For instance, because nitrogen attracts electrons more strongly, the electron pair in \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) is more tightly held, yet still more directional due to \(sp^3\) hybridization, enhancing its donor qualities compared to \(\mathrm{PH}_3\).
Consequently, knowledge of electronegativity aids in anticipating how molecules like \(\mathrm{NH}_3\) and \(\mathrm{PH}_3\) function as electron donors in various chemical contexts.