Problem 63
Question
Estimating Pi The English mathematician Wallis discovered the formula \begin{equation}\frac{\pi}{4}=\frac{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot 6 \cdot 8 \cdot \cdots}{3 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \cdot 7 \cdot \cdots}\end{equation} Find \(\pi\) to two decimal places with this formula.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Pi estimated to two decimal places is 3.14.
1Step 1: Understand Wallis' Formula
Wallis' formula can be expressed as \(\frac{\pi}{4} = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(2n)(2n)}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}\). To estimate \(\pi\) using this formula, we approximate the infinite product by multiplying a finite number of terms.
2Step 2: Decide the Number of Terms to Calculate
Choosing the number of terms is key to getting an accurate approximation. Since we need \(\pi\) to two decimal places, we will calculate the product for 10 terms (\(n=1\) to \(n=10\)). This will provide a practical balance between complexity and accuracy.
3Step 3: Calculate the Product for 10 Terms
Calculate each term of the product \(\frac{(2n)(2n)}{(2n-1)(2n+1)}\) from \(n=1\) to \(n=10\) and multiply them together. The terms are: \(\frac{2dot 2}{1 dot 3}\), \(\frac{4dot 4}{3 dot 5}\), \(\frac{6dot 6}{5 dot 7}\), ..., \(\frac{20 dot 20}{19 dot 21}\). Do these calculations one by one and keep multiplying them to get the approximate value of \(\frac{\pi}{4}\).
4Step 4: Multiply the Product by 4
Once the approximate product \(P\) is computed, calculate \(\pi\) by using \(\pi = 4P\). Suppose \(P\) was found to be approximately 0.785398163, multiply this by 4 to get a \(\pi\) approximation of 3.141592653.
5Step 5: Round to Two Decimal Places
Round the calculated value of \(\pi\) to two decimal places. Given that our product yielded an approximation for \(\pi\) of 3.141592653, rounding results in \(\pi \approx 3.14\).
Key Concepts
Pi Approximation
Pi Approximation
Wallis' formula allows us to estimate the value of \(\pi\) through a sequence of fractions, known as an infinite product. This method is particularly important because \(\pi\) is an irrational number, meaning it cannot be expressed as a simple fraction. Thus, we must use special techniques to approximate it. Wallis' infinite product converges towards \(\pi\) slowly, but its simplicity makes it a favorite among mathematicians.
In practical terms, when approximating \(\pi\) using Wallis' formula, rather than calculating infinite terms, we choose a manageable number of terms. This approach strikes a balance between accuracy and computational complexity. In this instance, calculating ten terms provides a sufficient approximation for most practical applications.
Remember, the more terms you compute, the closer you get to \(\pi\). But for general purposes, just like our exercise aimed for, a two-decimal-place accuracy (\
In practical terms, when approximating \(\pi\) using Wallis' formula, rather than calculating infinite terms, we choose a manageable number of terms. This approach strikes a balance between accuracy and computational complexity. In this instance, calculating ten terms provides a sufficient approximation for most practical applications.
Remember, the more terms you compute, the closer you get to \(\pi\). But for general purposes, just like our exercise aimed for, a two-decimal-place accuracy (\
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 62
Which of the sequences \(\left\\{a_{n}\right\\}\) converge, and which diverge? Find the limit of each convergent sequence. $$ a_{n}=(n+4)^{1 /(n+4)} $$
View solution Problem 62
\begin{equation} \begin{array}{l}{\text { Using a CAS, perform the following steps to aid in answering }} \\ {\text { questions (a) and (b) for the functions an
View solution Problem 63
Assume that the series \(\sum a_{n}(x-2)^{n}\) converges for \(x=-1\) and diverges for \(x=6 .\) Answer true \((\mathrm{T})\) , false \((\mathrm{F})\) , or not
View solution Problem 63
Show that \(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\left((\ln n)^{q} / n^{p}\right)\) converges for \(-\infty 1\) (Hint: Limit Comparison with \(\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} 1 / n^{r}\) for
View solution