Problem 62
Question
A beam of light enters a medium such as water or smoky air with initial intensity \(I_{0}\). Its intensity is decreased depending on the thickness (or concentration) of the medium. The intensity I at a depth (or concentration) of \(x\) units is given by $$I=I_{0} e^{-\mu x}$$ The constant \(\mu\left({ }^{u} m u "\right),\) called the coefficient of absorption, varies with the medium. Use this law for Exercises 62 and \(63 .\) Concentrations of particulates in the air due to pollution reduce sunlight. In a smoggy area, \(\mu=0.01\) and \(x\) is the concentration of particulates measured in micrograms per cubic meter \(\left(\mathrm{mcg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right)\) What change is more significant-dropping pollution levels from \(100 \mathrm{mcg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) to \(90 \mathrm{mcg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) or dropping them from \(60 \mathrm{mcg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) to \(50 \mathrm{mcg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) ? Why?
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Coefficient of Absorption
This concept shows up in the formula \( I = I_0 e^{-\mu x} \). Here, \( \mu \) identifies how potent the medium is at blocking or absorbing the light passing through. For light traveling through a smoky area, like in the problem described, a \( \mu \) value of \( 0.01 \) suggests moderate absorption, indicating that as the concentration \( x \) rises, the intensity \( I \) of the light diminishes at a measurable rate.
- Low \( \mu \) values suggest minimal absorption, meaning light travels farther without losing intensity.
- Higher \( \mu \) values indicate stronger absorption and greater intensity loss.
Intensity Change
To quantify this change, we need to plug values into the formula for different \( x \) concentrations. For this exercise:
- Initially, we calculate the light intensity for two concentrations: from \( 100 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) to \( 90 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \).
- Then, assess it from \( 60 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) to \( 50 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \).
Pollution Levels Impact
When we analyze changes in pollution levels, such as reducing from \( 100 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) to \( 90 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) versus \( 60 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) to \( 50 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \), we uncover how different environmental conditions can affect solar penetration. This can significantly influence climate patterns, plant growth, and atmospheric conditions.
The greater reduction effect observed when going from \( 60 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) to \( 50 \text{ mcg/m}^3 \) highlights the non-linear nature of exponential decay. It implies that even a small decrease in pollution at lower concentrations has a proportionally larger impact on improving light transmission.
Utilizing this understanding helps in optimizing environmental protection measures and strategizing pollution reduction to enhance solar exposure and ecological welfare.