Problem 55
Question
Estimate the value of \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(1 / n^{3}\right)\) to within 0.01 of its exact value.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The series sums to approximately 1.1975, accurate to within 0.01.
1Step 1: Understand the Series
The given series is called the Riemann zeta function, defined as \( \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s} \), for \( s > 1 \). Here, \( s = 3 \). The series converges because \( 3 > 1 \). We want to approximate \( \zeta(3) \) to within 0.01.
2Step 2: Use Approximate Series
Since we want an approximation, compute partial sums of the series: \( S_k = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n^3} \). Increase \( k \) until the remainder of the series, estimated by an appropriate method, is less than 0.01.
3Step 3: Choose Remainder Estimation Method
We use the integral test for convergence to estimate the remainder: \( R_k = \int_{k+1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^3} \, dx \). Calculate this to find the error in using \( S_k \) as an approximation to \( \zeta(3) \).
4Step 4: Compute the Integral for Remainder
Calculate the integral: \( \int_{k+1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^3} \, dx = \left[-\frac{1}{2x^2}\right]_{k+1}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{2(k+1)^2} \). Set this less than 0.01 to solve for \( k \).
5Step 5: Solve Inequality for k
The inequality is \( \frac{1}{2(k+1)^2} < 0.01 \). Solving gives \( k+1 > \sqrt{50} \approx 7.07 \). Thus, \( k \geq 7 \).
6Step 6: Calculate Partial Sum S_7
Compute the partial sum \( S_7 = \sum_{n=1}^{7} \frac{1}{n^3} \). This sum adds up to \( 1 + \frac{1}{8} + \frac{1}{27} + \frac{1}{64} + \frac{1}{125} + \frac{1}{216} + \frac{1}{343} \approx 1.1975 \).
7Step 7: Verify Accuracy
Calculate the actual error: since \( R_7 = \frac{1}{2(8)^2} = \frac{1}{128} \approx 0.0078 \), the partial sum \( S_7 \) is an accurate estimate with error less than 0.01.
Key Concepts
Series ConvergencePartial SumRemainder EstimationIntegral Test
Series Convergence
The concept of series convergence is fundamental when dealing with infinite series like the Riemann zeta function. When we say a series converges, it means its terms approach a finite number as more and more terms are added. For the Riemann zeta function, defined as \( \zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n^s} \), convergence happens when \( s > 1 \). In our original exercise, since \( s = 3 \), the series converges.
This is crucial as series that don't converge will not sum up to a finite value. Instead, they keep increasing indefinitely. For students, it's important to understand that the convergence of a series like the one with \( s = 3 \) allows us to calculate an approximate sum and makes it possible to estimate how close our approximation is to this actual value.
This is crucial as series that don't converge will not sum up to a finite value. Instead, they keep increasing indefinitely. For students, it's important to understand that the convergence of a series like the one with \( s = 3 \) allows us to calculate an approximate sum and makes it possible to estimate how close our approximation is to this actual value.
Partial Sum
A partial sum represents the sum of a finite number of terms from an otherwise infinite series. In our exercise, we use partial sums to approximate the total value of the Riemann zeta function for \( s = 3 \).
The partial sum is denoted by \( S_k = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n^3} \), where \( k \) is the number of terms we choose to add up. Increasing \( k \) generally yields a more accurate approximation of \( \zeta(3) \).
The partial sum is denoted by \( S_k = \sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n^3} \), where \( k \) is the number of terms we choose to add up. Increasing \( k \) generally yields a more accurate approximation of \( \zeta(3) \).
- A smaller \( k \): Rough approximation.
- A larger \( k \): Better approximation.
Remainder Estimation
After computing a partial sum, we can still be off from the true value of an infinite series. This "leftover" part is quantified as the remainder. The remainder estimation tells us how much we miss by not including all terms of the series beyond a certain point.
In the given exercise, we need to estimate the value of the series to within an error of 0.01. To manage this, we use a method called remainder estimation where we compute to see if \( R_k \), the remainder, is small enough. The key is ensuring this remainder, the integral from \( k+1 \) to infinity, is less than 0.01. Once it is, our partial sum is a good approximation of the exact sum.
In the given exercise, we need to estimate the value of the series to within an error of 0.01. To manage this, we use a method called remainder estimation where we compute to see if \( R_k \), the remainder, is small enough. The key is ensuring this remainder, the integral from \( k+1 \) to infinity, is less than 0.01. Once it is, our partial sum is a good approximation of the exact sum.
Integral Test
The integral test is a convergence test that compares a series to an improper integral to determine the series' behaviour. Here, it also assists in estimating the remainder. If we express this series as a function \( f(x) = \frac{1}{x^3} \), the integral test helps us conclude that the series converges.
By calculating the integral \( \int_{k+1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^3} \, dx \), we gain insights into how quickly or slowly the terms of the series diminish after some point \( k \). This integral gives a formula for estimating the remainder \( R_k = \frac{1}{2(k+1)^2} \).
When applying it, you get an idea of how accurately the partial sum \( S_k \) represents the exact value of\( \zeta(3) \). Such estimation is handy because it provides a mathematical guarantee on the error's size and ensures that the approximation meets defined accuracy needs.
By calculating the integral \( \int_{k+1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^3} \, dx \), we gain insights into how quickly or slowly the terms of the series diminish after some point \( k \). This integral gives a formula for estimating the remainder \( R_k = \frac{1}{2(k+1)^2} \).
When applying it, you get an idea of how accurately the partial sum \( S_k \) represents the exact value of\( \zeta(3) \). Such estimation is handy because it provides a mathematical guarantee on the error's size and ensures that the approximation meets defined accuracy needs.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 54
Improving approximations of \(\pi\) \begin{equation} \begin{array}{l}{\text { a. Let } P \text { be an approximation of } \pi \text { accurate to } n \text { de
View solution Problem 54
How many terms of the Taylor series for \(\ln (1+x)\) should you add to be sure of calculating ln \((1.1)\) with an error of magnitude less than \(10^{-8} ?\) G
View solution Problem 55
According to the Alternating Series Estimation Theorem, how many terms of the Taylor series for tan \(^{-1} 1\) would you have to add to be sure of finding \(\p
View solution Problem 55
The series $$ \sin x=x-\frac{x^{3}}{3 !}+\frac{x^{5}}{5 !}-\frac{x^{7}}{7 !}+\frac{x^{9}}{9 !}-\frac{x^{11}}{11 !}+\cdots $$ converges to sin \(x\) for all \(x\
View solution