Problem 54
Question
Using the standard reduction potentials listed in Appendix E, calculate the equilibrium constant for each of the following reactions at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\) : (a) \(\mathrm{Cu}(s)+2 \mathrm{Ag}^{+}(a q) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Cu}^{2+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{Ag}(s)\) (b) \(3 \mathrm{Ce}^{4+}(a q)+\mathrm{Bi}(s)+\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l)-\ldots\) \(3 \mathrm{Ce}^{3+}(a q)+\mathrm{BiO}^{+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{H}^{+}(a q)\) (c) \(\mathrm{N}_{2} \mathrm{H}_{5}^{+}(a q)+4 \mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}{\underline{\phantom{xx}}}^{3-}(a q)-\cdots \rightarrow\) \(\mathrm{N}_{2}(g)+5 \mathrm{H}^{+}(a q)+4 \mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}^{4^{-}}(a q)\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
In summary, for reaction (a) $\mathrm{Cu}(s)+2 \mathrm{Ag}^{+}(a q) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Cu}^{2+}(a q)+2 \mathrm{Ag}(s)$, the equilibrium constant (K) at $298\mathrm{~K}$ is \(1.31 \times 10^{10}\).
1Step 1: The two half-reactions are: Oxidation: \(\mathrm{Cu}(s) \longrightarrow \mathrm{Cu}^{2+}(a q) + 2 e^-\) Reduction: \(2 \mathrm{Ag}^{+}(a q) + 2 e^- \longrightarrow 2 \mathrm{Ag}(s)\) #Step 2: Determine the standard reduction potentials#
Using Appendix E, we find the standard reduction potentials for the half-reactions:
Cu²⁺/Cu: E° = +0.337 V
Ag⁺/Ag: E° = +0.799 V
#Step 3: Calculate the overall cell potential (E°)#
2Step 2: The cell potential is equal to the reduction potential of the cathode minus the reduction potential of the anode: E° = E°(cathode) - E°(anode). In our case, the copper half-reaction is the anode, and the silver half-reaction is the cathode. E° = (+0.799 V) - (+0.337 V) = +0.462 V #Step 4: Find the equilibrium constant (K)#
Using the relationship between cell potential and equilibrium constant:
\[\Delta G° = -nFE°\]
Also, using the relationship between Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constant:
\[\Delta G° = -RT \ln K\]
Combining these two equations and solving for K, we get:
\[K= \exp{ \frac{-nFE°}{RT}}\]
where n = number of electrons transferred in the reaction (in this case, n = 2), F is the Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol), R is the gas constant (8.314 J/mol·K), and T is the temperature in Kelvin (298 K).
Substituting the values:
\[K= \exp{ \frac{-2 \times 96485 \text{C/mol} \times 0.462 \text{V}}{8.314 \text{J/mol·K} \times 298 \text{K}} }\]
\[K = 1.31 \times 10^{10}\]
The equilibrium constant for reaction (a) is \(1.31 \times 10^{10}\).
For reactions (b) and (c), we would follow the same steps of identifying half-reactions, determining standard reduction potentials, calculating the cell potential, and then finding the equilibrium constant.
Key Concepts
Standard Reduction PotentialNernst EquationGibbs Free Energy
Standard Reduction Potential
Understanding standard reduction potential, often denoted as E°, is crucial in the field of electrochemistry. It is a measure of the tendency of a chemical species to acquire electrons and thereby be reduced. Each species has an intrinsic standard reduction potential, expressed in volts (V), which is determined under standard conditions: a concentration of 1 M for aqueous species, a pressure of 1 bar for gases, and pure solids or liquids in their standard states at 25°C (298 K).
Standard reduction potentials are available in tables, like the Appendix E mentioned in the exercise, which allow us to compare different substances. For example, we know that if the standard reduction potential is more positive, the substance is more likely to be reduced. In the context of our exercise, copper (Cu) has a standard reduction potential of +0.337 V, while silver (Ag⁺) has a potential of +0.799 V. This indicates that silver ions have a greater tendency to gain electrons and form silver metal compared to copper ions forming copper metal.
Standard reduction potentials are available in tables, like the Appendix E mentioned in the exercise, which allow us to compare different substances. For example, we know that if the standard reduction potential is more positive, the substance is more likely to be reduced. In the context of our exercise, copper (Cu) has a standard reduction potential of +0.337 V, while silver (Ag⁺) has a potential of +0.799 V. This indicates that silver ions have a greater tendency to gain electrons and form silver metal compared to copper ions forming copper metal.
- The standard reduction potential is essential for calculating the cell potential of an electrochemical reaction.
- It provides insights into the spontaneity of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions.
Nernst Equation
The Nernst equation comes into play when we need to calculate the potential of an electrochemical cell under any conditions, not just the standard ones. It's derived from thermodynamics and incorporates both the standard reduction potential and the concentrations of the reactants and products involved in the reaction.
For a reaction at standard conditions, the standard cell potential (E°) would suffice. However, conditions often vary, and that's where the Nernst equation becomes a powerful tool. It is mathematically expressed as:\[\begin{equation}E = E° - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q\text{,}\end{equation}\]where E is the cell potential, R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature in kelvin, n is the number of moles of electrons exchanged, F is Faraday's constant, and Q is the reaction quotient, which reflects the actual concentrations of reactants and products. In the logarithmic term, natural logarithms are used, which can also be expressed as a base-10 logarithm by adjusting coefficients appropriately.
For a reaction at standard conditions, the standard cell potential (E°) would suffice. However, conditions often vary, and that's where the Nernst equation becomes a powerful tool. It is mathematically expressed as:\[\begin{equation}E = E° - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q\text{,}\end{equation}\]where E is the cell potential, R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature in kelvin, n is the number of moles of electrons exchanged, F is Faraday's constant, and Q is the reaction quotient, which reflects the actual concentrations of reactants and products. In the logarithmic term, natural logarithms are used, which can also be expressed as a base-10 logarithm by adjusting coefficients appropriately.
- The equation highlights the impact of concentration and temperature on cell potential.
- It is particularly useful when dealing with non-standard conditions.
Gibbs Free Energy
The concept of Gibbs free energy, symbolized as ΔG, is pivotal in predicting the spontaneity of a process. In electrochemical terms, it's directly connected to the cell potential and equilibrium constant. Gibbs free energy can tell us whether a reaction will occur on its own, without any added energy. A negative ΔG indicates a spontaneous reaction, while a positive ΔG suggests non-spontaneity.
The link between Gibbs free energy and the equilibrium constant (K) is defined by the equation:\[\begin{equation}ΔG° = -RT\ln K\text{,}\end{equation}\]where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvins, and K is the equilibrium constant. This equation reveals that a larger equilibrium constant corresponds to a more negative ΔG°, indicating a stronger tendency for the reaction to proceed to completion.
In the exercise, we used the relationship between ΔG° and the cell potential:\[\begin{equation}ΔG° = -nFE°\text{,}\end{equation}\]where n is the number of electrons transferred and F is Faraday's constant. Combining these equations allows us to link E°, the standard cell potential, directly to the equilibrium constant, enabling us to calculate K from known potentials. Therefore, Gibbs free energy acts as a bridge between thermodynamics and electrochemistry, forming a foundation for understanding and predicting chemical reactions.
The link between Gibbs free energy and the equilibrium constant (K) is defined by the equation:\[\begin{equation}ΔG° = -RT\ln K\text{,}\end{equation}\]where R is the gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvins, and K is the equilibrium constant. This equation reveals that a larger equilibrium constant corresponds to a more negative ΔG°, indicating a stronger tendency for the reaction to proceed to completion.
In the exercise, we used the relationship between ΔG° and the cell potential:\[\begin{equation}ΔG° = -nFE°\text{,}\end{equation}\]where n is the number of electrons transferred and F is Faraday's constant. Combining these equations allows us to link E°, the standard cell potential, directly to the equilibrium constant, enabling us to calculate K from known potentials. Therefore, Gibbs free energy acts as a bridge between thermodynamics and electrochemistry, forming a foundation for understanding and predicting chemical reactions.
- A key player in determining reaction spontaneity.
- Connects electrochemical potentials to equilibrium states.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 52
If the equilibrium constant for a one-electron redox reaction at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\) is \(8.7 \times 10^{4}\), calculate the corresponding \(\Delta G^{\circ}\)
View solution Problem 53
Using the standard reduction potentials listed in Appendix \(\mathrm{E}\), calculate the equilibrium constant for each of the following reactions at \(298 \math
View solution Problem 55
A cell has a standard emf of \(+0.177 \mathrm{~V}\) at \(298 \mathrm{~K}\). What is the value of the equilibrium constant for the cell reaction (a) if \(n=1\) ?
View solution Problem 56
At \(298 \mathrm{~K}\) a cell reaction has a standard emf of \(+0.17 \mathrm{~V}\). The equilibrium constant for the cell reaction is \(5.5 \times 10^{5} .\) Wh
View solution