Problem 5
Question
The Cost of a Postage Stamp - Consider the following data. Use the procedures in this chapter to capture the trend of the data if one exists. Would you eliminate any data points? Why? Would you be willing to use your model to predict the price of a postage stamp on January \(1,2010 ?\) What do the various models you construct predict about the price on January \(1,2010 ?\) When will the price reach \$1? You might enjoy reading the article on which this problem is based: Donald \(\mathrm{R}\). Byrkit and Robert E. Lee, "The Cost of a Postage Stamp, or Up, Up, and Away," Mathematics and Computer Education 17, no. 3 (Summer 1983): \(184-190\). \begin{tabular}{lcl} \hline \multicolumn{1}{c} { Date } & \multicolumn{1}{c} { First-class stamp } \\\ \hline \(1885-1917\) & \(\$ 0.02\) \\ \(1917-1919\) & \(0.03\) & (Wartime increase) \\ 1919 & \(0.02\) & (Restored by Congress) \\ July 6, 1932 & \(0.03\) & \\ August 1, 1958 & \(0.04\) & \\ January 7, 1963 & \(0.05\) & \\ January 7,1968 & \(0.06\) & \\ May 16, 1971 & \(0.08\) & \\ March 2, 1974 & \(0.10\) & \\ December 31, 1975 & \(0.13\) & (Temporary) \\ July 18, 1976 & \(0.13\) & \\ May 15, 1978 & \(0.15\) & \\ March 22, 1981 & \(0.18\) & \\ November 1, 1981 & \(0.20\) & \\ February 17, 1985 & \(0.22\) & \\ April 3, 1988 & \(0.25\) & \\ February 3, 1991 & \(0.29\) & \\ January 1, 1995 & \(0.32\) & \\ January 10, 1999 & \(0.33\) & \\ January 7, 2001 & \(0.34\) & \\ June 30, 2002 & \(0.37\) & \\ January 8, 2006 & \(0.39\) & \\ May 14, 2007 & \(0.41\) & \\ May 12, 2008 & \(0.42\) & \\ May 11, 2009 & \(0.44\) & \\ January 22, 2012 & \(0.45\) & \\ \hline \end{tabular}
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Data Analysis
Examining each data entry chronologically, we want to note any significant events, such as wartime price increases or interventions by Congress, which could impact our analysis. These instances represent possible outliers and might need special consideration or even removal to ensure that our model's predictions remain accurate.
After organizing the data, we construct a plot to visually represent the trends over time. Visualization in data analysis allows us to see patterns that are not immediately obvious in raw numeric data. It can highlight periods of rapid increase or stability, guiding us toward suitable modeling methods.
Trend Analysis
Our primary goal is to distinguish if the change in prices follows a particular trend, such as linear growth or possibly exponential growth due to economic factors like inflation. By carefully observing the plotted data, we can identify periods where the price rises steeply, remains stable, or fluctuates due to external factors.
It's crucial during trend analysis to note the consistency of these trends. Are changes in stamp prices consistent over time, or are there periods of rapid change? Consistency will inform the type of model we choose to implement.
Price Prediction
Once we identify a trend, the next step is selecting a suitable model. For instances like historical price changes, an exponential model is often appropriate due to compounding factors such as inflation.
After choosing the model, we fit it to the data using statistical tools, determining the model parameters that offer the best representation of trends. The model's accuracy is then evaluated through metrics like R-squared, which indicates how closely the model matches the data.
- If outliers like wartime increases affect the accuracy, consider adjusting the data set accordingly.
- Using the refined model, we can extrapolate the future price of a stamp, predicting not only the price for 2010 but also estimating when it might reach $1.