Problem 5
Question
For events \(\mathcal{A}_{1}, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_{n}\), define \(\alpha_{1}:=\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1}\right],\) and for \(i=2, \ldots, n,\) define \(\alpha_{i}:=\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{i} \mid \mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]\) (assume that \(\left.\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n-1}\right] \neq 0\right)\). Show that \(\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n}\right]=\alpha_{1} \cdots \alpha_{n}\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Question: Show that the probability of the intersection of \(n\) events is equal to the product of their defined probabilities.
Answer: To prove that the probability of the intersection of \(n\) events is equal to the product of their defined probabilities, we used the definition of conditional probability, properties of intersections of events, and induction. We showed that \(\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_n\), where \(\alpha_i = \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_i \mid \mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]\) for \(i = 2, \ldots, n\) and \(\alpha_1 = \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1\right]\).
1Step 1: Understand the given definitions
We are given a sequence of events \(\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_n\), and we are asked to prove that:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_n$$
where
$$\begin{aligned}
\alpha_1 = \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1\right], \\
\alpha_i = \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_i \mid \mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]\\
\end{aligned}$$
for \(i = 2, \ldots, n\).
2Step 2: Define conditional probability
Recall that conditional probability is defined as:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[A \mid B\right] = \frac{\mathrm{P}\left[A \cap B\right]}{\mathrm{P}\left[B\right]}$$
3Step 3: Use conditional probability to connect the given definitions
We will use the definition of conditional probability to relate \(\alpha_i\) to the intersection of the events.
For \(i = 2, \ldots, n\), we have:
$$\alpha_i = \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_i \mid \mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right] = \frac{\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_i\right]}{\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]}$$
4Step 4: Calculate the probability of the intersection
To find the probability of the intersection, we will multiply both sides of the equations from Step 3 by \(\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]\) and express the result in terms of \(\alpha_i\):
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_i\right] = \alpha_i \mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{i-1}\right]$$
5Step 5: Proof by induction
We will now use induction to show that \(\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_n\).
Base case:
For \(n = 1\), we have:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1\right] = \alpha_1$$
which is true by definition.
Induction step:
Assume that for some \(k \geq 1\), we have:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{k}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_k$$
We want to show that:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{k+1}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_k \alpha_{k+1}$$
Using the equation from Step 4:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{k+1}\right] = \alpha_{k+1}\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{k}\right]$$
And substituting the induction assumption:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_1 \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{k+1}\right] = \alpha_{k+1}(\alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_k) = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_k \alpha_{k+1}$$
Thus, the induction step holds.
6Step 6: Conclusion
By induction, we have shown that the probability of the intersection of \(n\) events is equal to the product of their defined probabilities:
$$\mathrm{P}\left[\mathcal{A}_{1} \cap \cdots \cap \mathcal{A}_{n}\right] = \alpha_1 \cdots \alpha_n$$
Key Concepts
Conditional ProbabilityProbability TheoryInduction in Mathematics
Conditional Probability
Conditional probability is a fundamental concept in probability theory that deals with the likelihood of an event occurring given that another event has already occurred. It captures the idea that the occurrence of one event can influence the probability of another. For example, if we know it's raining, the probability that people carry umbrellas is likely higher compared to a day with no rain.
In mathematical terms, the conditional probability of an event A given another event B has occurred is denoted as P(A|B), and is calculated by the formula:
\[\mathrm{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathrm{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathrm{P}(B)}\]
This formula tells us that to find the conditional probability, we divide the probability of the intersection of A and B by the probability of B alone. This is because when B has occurred, the sample space is reduced to only the outcomes where B is true, and we are looking at the probability of A within this reduced space. In the exercise, correctly applying conditional probability is crucial to prove the relationship between the compound probability of multiple events and their individual conditional probabilities.
In mathematical terms, the conditional probability of an event A given another event B has occurred is denoted as P(A|B), and is calculated by the formula:
\[\mathrm{P}(A \mid B) = \frac{\mathrm{P}(A \cap B)}{\mathrm{P}(B)}\]
This formula tells us that to find the conditional probability, we divide the probability of the intersection of A and B by the probability of B alone. This is because when B has occurred, the sample space is reduced to only the outcomes where B is true, and we are looking at the probability of A within this reduced space. In the exercise, correctly applying conditional probability is crucial to prove the relationship between the compound probability of multiple events and their individual conditional probabilities.
Probability Theory
Probability theory is the branch of mathematics that studies random events and quantifies the likelihood of their occurrence. It provides a mathematical framework for predicting the outcomes of complex systems where chance plays a role. This theory is applied in numerous fields such as finance, insurance, psychology, and physics, to name a few.
Fundamental to this theory is the concept of an 'event,' which is a set of outcomes from a probability experiment. These events can be simple, consisting of a single outcome, or compound, involving combinations of simple events. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty. In the context of the textbook exercise, the probability theory principles are applied to derive a general product rule for the probability of the intersection of multiple events (\(\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_n\)).
Fundamental to this theory is the concept of an 'event,' which is a set of outcomes from a probability experiment. These events can be simple, consisting of a single outcome, or compound, involving combinations of simple events. The probability of an event is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty. In the context of the textbook exercise, the probability theory principles are applied to derive a general product rule for the probability of the intersection of multiple events (\(\mathcal{A}_1, \ldots, \mathcal{A}_n\)).
Induction in Mathematics
Induction in mathematics is a powerful technique for proving statements, propositions, or theorems that are formulated in terms of natural numbers. It consists of two critical steps:
Through these two steps, we can effectively demonstrate the truth of the statement for all natural numbers. In our exercise, mathematical induction is used to extend the proof that the probability of the intersection of a set of events equals the product of their individual probabilities from a base case of one event to any number 'n' of events. This is done by showing that this property holds for one event (the base case), and then assuming it holds for 'k' events, it can be proved for 'k+1' events (the inductive step). This extrapolation cements the proof, establishing the relationship expressed in the problem for any number of events.
- Base Case: Proving the statement is true for the initial value, often for 1 or 0.
- Inductive Step: Assuming the statement is true for some natural number 'k' (the induction hypothesis), then proving it is also true for 'k+1'.
Through these two steps, we can effectively demonstrate the truth of the statement for all natural numbers. In our exercise, mathematical induction is used to extend the proof that the probability of the intersection of a set of events equals the product of their individual probabilities from a base case of one event to any number 'n' of events. This is done by showing that this property holds for one event (the base case), and then assuming it holds for 'k' events, it can be proved for 'k+1' events (the inductive step). This extrapolation cements the proof, establishing the relationship expressed in the problem for any number of events.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 3
Let \(m\) be a positive integer, and let \(\alpha(m)\) be the probability that a number chosen at random from \(\\{1, \ldots, m\\}\) is divisible by either \(4,
View solution Problem 4
This exercise asks you to generalize Boole's inequality (8.6), proving Bonferroni's inequalities. Let \(\left\\{\mathcal{A}_{i}\right\\}_{i \in I}\) be a finite
View solution Problem 6
Let \(\mathcal{B}\) be an event, and let \(\left\\{\mathcal{B}_{i}\right\\}_{i \in I}\) be a finite, pairwise disjoint family of events whose union is \(B\). Ge
View solution Problem 7
Let \(\mathcal{B}\) be an event with \(\mathrm{P}[\mathcal{B}] \neq 0,\) and let \(\left\\{\mathcal{C}_{i}\right\\}_{i \in I}\) be a finite, pairwise disjoint f
View solution