Problem 5
Question
EXERCISE 13.5. Let \(\rho_{i}: M_{i} \rightarrow M_{i}^{\prime},\) for \(i=1, \ldots, k,\) be \(R\) -linear maps. Show that the map $$\begin{aligned} \rho: & \boldsymbol{M}_{1} \times \cdots \times \boldsymbol{M}_{k} \rightarrow \boldsymbol{M}_{1}^{\prime} \times \cdots \times \boldsymbol{M}_{k}^{\prime} \\\ \left(\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{k}\right) & \mapsto\left(\rho_{1}\left(\alpha_{1}\right), \ldots, \rho_{k}\left(\alpha_{k}\right)\right) \end{aligned}$$ is an \(R\) -linear map.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
By following the step-by-step solution process, we have demonstrated that the combined map \(\rho: M_{1} \times \cdots \times M_{k} \rightarrow M_{1}^{\prime} \times \cdots \times M_{k}^{\prime}\) preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. Consequently, we can conclude that \(\rho\) is an \(R\)-linear map.
1Step 1: Define the combined map, \(\rho\)
The given combined map is defined as:
$$\rho: M_{1} \times \cdots \times M_{k} \rightarrow M_{1}^{\prime} \times \cdots \times M_{k}^{\prime}$$
$$\rho(\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k) = (\rho_1(\alpha_1), \ldots, \rho_k(\alpha_k))$$
This map takes a tuple of input elements from the product space \(M_{1} \times \cdots \times M_{k}\) and maps each element to the corresponding element in the product space \(M_{1}^{\prime} \times \cdots \times M_{k}^{\prime}\).
2Step 2: Check the vector addition property
To show that the map \(\rho\) preserves vector addition, we need to show that, for any \(\textbf{x}=(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\) and \(\textbf{y}=(y_1,\ldots,y_k)\):
$$\rho(\textbf{x}+\textbf{y}) = \rho(\textbf{x}) + \rho(\textbf{y})$$
Adding the two tuples \(\textbf{x}\) and \(\textbf{y}\), we have:
$$\textbf{x} + \textbf{y} = (x_1+y_1, \ldots, x_k+y_k)$$
Now, let's compute \(\rho(\textbf{x}+\textbf{y})\):
$$\rho(\textbf{x} + \textbf{y}) = \rho(x_1+y_1, \ldots, x_k+y_k) = (\rho_1(x_1+y_1), \ldots, \rho_k(x_k+y_k))$$
Using the linearity of individual \(\rho_i'\)s:
$$\rho(\textbf{x}+\textbf{y}) = (\rho_1(x_1)+\rho_1(y_1), \ldots, \rho_k(x_k)+\rho_k(y_k))$$
Now, compute \(\rho(\textbf{x})+\rho(\textbf{y})\):
$$\rho(\textbf{x})+\rho(\textbf{y}) = (\rho_1(x_1),\ldots,\rho_k(x_k)) + (\rho_1(y_1),\ldots,\rho_k(y_k)) = (\rho_1(x_1)+\rho_1(y_1), \ldots, \rho_k(x_k)+\rho_k(y_k))$$
Since \(\rho(\textbf{x}+\textbf{y}) = \rho(\textbf{x})+\rho(\textbf{y})\), the vector addition property holds.
3Step 3: Check scalar multiplication property
To show that the map \(\rho\) preserves scalar multiplication, we need to show that, for any \(\textbf{x}=(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\) and scalar \(r \in R\):
$$\rho(r\textbf{x}) = r\rho(\textbf{x})$$
Consider the tuple \(r\textbf{x}\):
$$r\textbf{x} = (rx_1, \ldots, rx_k)$$
Now, compute \(\rho(r\textbf{x})\):
$$\rho(r\textbf{x}) = \rho(rx_1, \ldots, rx_k) = (\rho_1(rx_1), \ldots, \rho_k(rx_k))$$
Using the linearity of individual \(\rho_i'\)s:
$$\rho(r\textbf{x}) = (r\rho_1(x_1), \ldots, r\rho_k(x_k))$$
Now, compute \(r\rho(\textbf{x})\):
$$r\rho(\textbf{x}) = r(\rho_1(x_1),\ldots, \rho_k(x_k)) = (r\rho_1(x_1), \ldots, r\rho_k(x_k))$$
Since \(\rho(r\textbf{x}) = r\rho(\textbf{x})\), the scalar multiplication property holds.
As both vector addition and scalar multiplication properties hold for the given map \(\rho\), it is indeed an \(R\)-linear map.
Key Concepts
Vector AdditionScalar MultiplicationR-Linear Maps
Vector Addition
When working with vector spaces, vector addition is a fundamental operation. It allows us to combine two vectors to create a new one. For any two vectors, say \( \mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k) \) and \( \mathbf{y} = (y_1, y_2, \ldots, y_k) \), vector addition means adding the corresponding elements from each vector. The result is another vector:
For mappings such as \( \rho \) defined in the exercise, vector addition plays a critical role. To establish that the map is linear, it must respect vector addition. You can see that \( \rho(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) = \rho(\mathbf{x}) + \rho(\mathbf{y}) \) holds, confirming that the operation preserves the structure of addition in the vector space. This property is vital for the validity of \( R \)-linear maps.
- The sum of these two vectors is \( \mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y} = (x_1+y_1, x_2+y_2, \ldots, x_k+y_k) \).
For mappings such as \( \rho \) defined in the exercise, vector addition plays a critical role. To establish that the map is linear, it must respect vector addition. You can see that \( \rho(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) = \rho(\mathbf{x}) + \rho(\mathbf{y}) \) holds, confirming that the operation preserves the structure of addition in the vector space. This property is vital for the validity of \( R \)-linear maps.
Scalar Multiplication
Scalar multiplication in vector spaces is the process of changing the magnitude of a vector by a scalar, which we often denote by \( r \). When you multiply a scalar \( r \) with a vector \( \mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k) \), you multiply each component of the vector by that scalar:
This equality ensures that the mapping \( \rho \) maintains consistency in scaling vectors. It's one of the two defining properties that confirm \( \rho \) as a linear map. The maintenance of scalar multiplication under the mapping process ensures that linearity is not lost when vectors are scaled, enhancing the predictability and utility of such linear mappings.
- The product is \( r\mathbf{x} = (rx_1, rx_2, \ldots, rx_k) \).
This equality ensures that the mapping \( \rho \) maintains consistency in scaling vectors. It's one of the two defining properties that confirm \( \rho \) as a linear map. The maintenance of scalar multiplication under the mapping process ensures that linearity is not lost when vectors are scaled, enhancing the predictability and utility of such linear mappings.
R-Linear Maps
An \( R \)-linear map, often simply referred to as a linear map, is a functional construct between two modules over a ring \( R \) that preserves vector addition and scalar multiplication. This means for any linear map \( \rho \), and for all vectors \( \mathbf{x} \), \( \mathbf{y} \) in the domain, and scalar \( r \) in \( R \):
In the exercise, you are dealing with a composite \( R \)-linear map \( \rho \) that acts on Cartesian products \( M_1 \times \cdots \times M_k \). It's crucial to verify that this map respects linearity across both vector addition and scalar multiplication. The mapping \( \rho \) is assembled from component maps \( \rho_i \) that are individually \( R \)-linear. This means each part of the product respects the linear operations, confirming the overall linearity of the composite map \( \rho \). Linear maps like these are essential in many areas of mathematics, as they simplify complex relationships between vector spaces.
- \( \rho(\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{y}) = \rho(\mathbf{x}) + \rho(\mathbf{y}) \) for vector addition.
- \( \rho(r\mathbf{x}) = r\rho(\mathbf{x}) \) for scalar multiplication.
In the exercise, you are dealing with a composite \( R \)-linear map \( \rho \) that acts on Cartesian products \( M_1 \times \cdots \times M_k \). It's crucial to verify that this map respects linearity across both vector addition and scalar multiplication. The mapping \( \rho \) is assembled from component maps \( \rho_i \) that are individually \( R \)-linear. This means each part of the product respects the linear operations, confirming the overall linearity of the composite map \( \rho \). Linear maps like these are essential in many areas of mathematics, as they simplify complex relationships between vector spaces.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 3
Show that if \(R\) is non-trivial, then the \(R\) -module \(R[X]\) is not finitely generated.
View solution Problem 4
Verify that the "is isomorphic to" relation on \(R\) -modules is an equivalence relation; that is, for all \(R\) -modules \(M_{1}, M_{2}, M_{3},\) we have: (a)
View solution Problem 6
Let \(\rho: M \rightarrow M^{\prime}\) be an \(R\) -linear map, and let \(c \in R\). Show that \(\rho(c \boldsymbol{M})=c \rho(M)\).
View solution Problem 7
Let \(\rho: M \rightarrow M^{\prime}\) be an \(R\) -linear map. Let \(N\) be a submodule of \(M,\) and let \(\tau: N \rightarrow M^{\prime}\) be the restriction
View solution