Problem 47
Question
Use a truth table to determine whether each statement is a tautology, a self- contradiction, or neither. \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow(\sim p \vee q)\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Given the rules for logical connectives, the final truth table will show that each row in the column for \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\) is true, regardless of the truth values of 'p' and 'q'. Hence, the statement \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\) is a tautology.
1Step 1: Identify the Components
The statement given is \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\). Here, 'p' and 'q' are simple statements, \(\rightarrow\) stands for 'implies', \(\leftrightarrow\) is the 'if and only if' connective, \(\sim\) represents 'not', and \(\vee\) is the 'or' connective.
2Step 2: Construct the Initial Truth Table
The initial truth table will include columns for 'p' and 'q'. Each of these columns will contain four rows, reflecting all possible combinations of truth values for two components: TT, TF, FT, FF.
3Step 3: Add Columns for the Parts of the Complex Statement
Next add columns for \(\sim p\), \(p \rightarrow q\), \(\sim p \vee q\), and finally, \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\). The values in these columns are determined based on the truth values of 'p' and 'q' and the logical connectives' definitions.
4Step 4: Evaluate the Main Statement
Evaluate the values under the column \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\). If all the entries in this column are 'T', the statement is a tautology. If they are all 'F', it is a self-contradiction. Otherwise, if the entries are a mix of 'T's and 'F's, the statement is neither a tautology nor a contradiction.
Key Concepts
Logical ConnectivesTautologySelf-ContradictionTruth Values
Logical Connectives
Logical connectives are tools that combine, modify, or relate statements within logical propositions. In our exercise, we deal with several connectives:
- Implication (\(\rightarrow\)): Indicates that one statement leads to another. If "p implies q" (\(p \rightarrow q\)), it means whenever p is true, q must also be true.
- Negation (\(\sim\)): Simply flips the truth value of a statement. So, "not p" (\(\sim p\)) is true when p is false, and vice versa.
- Disjunction (\(\vee\)): Represents an "or" situation. "p or q" (\(p \vee q\)) is true if either p, q, or both are true.
- Biconditional (\(\leftrightarrow\)): Expresses "if and only if". It tells us the statements on either side must both be true, or both be false, for the compound statement to be true.
Tautology
A tautology is a logical statement that is true in every possible situation. The statement holds true irrespective of the truth values of the individual components involved. In our exercise, the complete process of evaluating whether \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\) is a tautology involves:
- Construction of a truth table that displays all possible truth value combinations for the variables p and q.
- Application of logical operations to assess the truth of the entire expression for each combination.
Self-Contradiction
A self-contradiction is a logical statement that is false in every situation. No matter the input truth values of its components, the entire statement will always evaluate as false. This provides a sharp contrast to a tautology. For our present challenge, determining if \((p \rightarrow q) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee q)\) is a self-contradiction works through the truth table as follows:
- Examine each possible truth value setup for p and q.
- Assess the resulting value for the statement under all combinations.
Truth Values
Truth values are the building blocks of logical expressions. They are simply the data that tells us whether a statement is true or false. In constructing truth tables, we assign truth values to each part:
- True (T): Indicates the statement is correct.
- False (F): Indicates the statement is incorrect.
- For two statements (like p and q), there are four possible combinations: True/True, True/False, False/True, and False/False.
- This forms the basis for constructing a comprehensive truth table, showing all possible truth values for the expressions being evaluated.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 47
Use the standard forms of valid arguments to draw a valid conclusion from the given premises. If all electricity is off, then no lights work. Some lights work.
View solution Problem 47
Express each statement in "if . . then" form. (More than one correct wording in "if ... then" form is possible.) Then write the statement's converse, inverse, c
View solution Problem 47
a. Write each statement in symbolic form. Assign letters to simple statements that are not negated. b. Construct a truth table for the symbolic statement in par
View solution Problem 47
Let \(q\) and \(r\) represent the following simple statements: q: It is July 4th. \(r\) : We are having a barbecue. Write each symbolic statement in words. \(\s
View solution