Problem 47
Question
Solve the system, or show that it has no solution. If the system has infinitely many solutions, express them in the ordered pair form given in Example 6. $$\left\\{\begin{aligned}\frac{1}{3} x-\frac{1}{4} y &=2 \\\\-8 x+6 y &=10\end{aligned}\right.$$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The system has no solution.
1Step 1: Eliminate fractions
Starting with the equation \( \frac{1}{3}x - \frac{1}{4}y = 2 \), we eliminate the fractions by finding a common denominator. The common denominator of 3 and 4 is 12. Multiply every term by 12 to get: \( 4x - 3y = 24 \).
2Step 2: Set up the rewritten system
With the equation \( 4x - 3y = 24 \) from Step 1, and the second original equation "`-8x + 6y = 10`", we have the system:\[\begin{aligned} 4x - 3y &= 24, \-8x + 6y &= 10. \end{aligned}\]
3Step 3: Simplify and compare equations
Notice that the second equation \( -8x + 6y = 10 \) can be simplified by dividing every term by 2 to get \( -4x + 3y = 5 \). Now compare it with the first equation: \( 4x - 3y = 24 \).
4Step 4: Add the Equations
Add the equations: \( (4x - 3y) + (-4x + 3y) = 24 + 5 \). This results in \( 0 = 29 \).
5Step 5: Analyze the result
Since the equality \( 0 = 29 \) is false, this indicates that the system of equations has no solution.
Key Concepts
Elimination MethodFractions in EquationsNo Solution Scenario
Elimination Method
The elimination method is a powerful technique for solving systems of equations. It involves removing one variable by cleverly adding or subtracting equations. This way, you're left with a simpler equation to solve.
Here's how it often works:
When you see something this illogical, it quickly tells you there’s no way to balance both equations simultaneously. Thus, while the elimination approach is usually straightforward, you might run into scenarios indicating something else, like no possible solution.
Here's how it often works:
- Choose one variable to eliminate between the equations by aligning them. In this example, aligning the coefficients of the variables was a helpful start.
- Add or subtract equations to eliminate that variable. Sometimes you might need to multiply equations by constants first to align terms for elimination.
When you see something this illogical, it quickly tells you there’s no way to balance both equations simultaneously. Thus, while the elimination approach is usually straightforward, you might run into scenarios indicating something else, like no possible solution.
Fractions in Equations
Fractions in equations can make solving them seem complex. However, eliminating fractions is a handy first step to simplify things.
Start by finding a common denominator among the fractions. Multiply every term of the equation by this common denominator.
For example, the given problem had fractions in the first equation, with denominators 3 and 4. The least common denominator is 12. By multiplying the whole equation by 12, the fractions disappear, making it much easier to continue solving the problem efficiently.
After removing fractions, the equation becomes simpler, with whole numbers instead of fractions, allowing you to see more clearly the relationships between variable terms. This clarity is crucial when you're solving using techniques like elimination or substitution.
Start by finding a common denominator among the fractions. Multiply every term of the equation by this common denominator.
For example, the given problem had fractions in the first equation, with denominators 3 and 4. The least common denominator is 12. By multiplying the whole equation by 12, the fractions disappear, making it much easier to continue solving the problem efficiently.
After removing fractions, the equation becomes simpler, with whole numbers instead of fractions, allowing you to see more clearly the relationships between variable terms. This clarity is crucial when you're solving using techniques like elimination or substitution.
No Solution Scenario
Sometimes, when solving a system of equations, you reach a situation where there is no solution. This often happens when both equations represent parallel lines that never intersect.
In the example provided, after eliminating the fractions and simplifying the equations through arithmetic manipulation, we end up with a non-intersecting scenario, which is evidenced by the equation "0 = 29".
Remember, a result like this, where you have an inherently false statement, hints at the possibility of two parallel lines or entirely inconsistent equations—meaning there's no possible value that satisfies both equations at once.
Recognizing this scenario is important because it saves you from making endless calculations, helping you understand that sometimes, the system you’re dealing with simply has no solution.
In the example provided, after eliminating the fractions and simplifying the equations through arithmetic manipulation, we end up with a non-intersecting scenario, which is evidenced by the equation "0 = 29".
Remember, a result like this, where you have an inherently false statement, hints at the possibility of two parallel lines or entirely inconsistent equations—meaning there's no possible value that satisfies both equations at once.
Recognizing this scenario is important because it saves you from making endless calculations, helping you understand that sometimes, the system you’re dealing with simply has no solution.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 47
Can a Linear System Have Exactly Two Solutions? (a) Suppose that \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}\right)\) and \(\left(x_{1}, y_{1}, z_{1}\right)\) are solutions of
View solution Problem 47
For each expression, determine whether it is already a partial fraction decomposition or whether it can be decomposed further. (a) \(\frac{x}{x^{2}+1}+\frac{1}{
View solution Problem 48
Use a graphing calculator to graph the solution of the system of inequalities. Find the coordinates of all vertices, rounded to one decimal place. $$\left\\{\be
View solution Problem 48
On a sheet of graph paper or using a graphing calculator, draw the parabola \(y=x^{2} .\) Then draw the graphs of the linear equation \(y=x+k\) on the same coor
View solution