Problem 30
Question
If \(\alpha, \beta\) be the roots of \(x^{2}+p x-q=0\) and \(\gamma, \delta\) be the roots of \(x^{2}+p x+r=0, q+r \neq 0\), then \(\frac{(\alpha-\gamma)(\alpha-\delta)}{(\beta-\gamma)(\beta-\delta)}=\) (A) 1 (B) \(q\) (C) \(\vec{r}\) (D) \(q+r\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The answer is 1, which corresponds to option (A).
1Step 1: Use Vieta's Formulas
For the equation \(x^2 + px - q = 0\), Vieta's formulas give us \(\alpha + \beta = -p\) and \(\alpha \beta = -q\). Similarly, for \(x^2 + px + r = 0\), we have \(\gamma + \delta = -p\) and \(\gamma \delta = r\).
2Step 2: Express Terms Using Root Relations
Rewrite \((\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta)\) and \((\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta)\) using the difference of roots: \[ (x - \gamma)(x - \delta) = x^2 - (\gamma + \delta)x + \gamma\delta \].Thus, substitute for \(x = \alpha\) and \(x = \beta\) respectively:\[ (\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta) = \alpha^2 - (\gamma + \delta)\alpha + \gamma\delta \],\[ (\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta) = \beta^2 - (\gamma + \delta)\beta + \gamma\delta \].
3Step 3: Substitute Values from Vieta's Formulas
Since \(\gamma + \delta = -p\) and \(\gamma \delta = r\), we can substitute into these expressions:\[(\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta) = \alpha^2 + p\alpha + r \],\[(\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta) = \beta^2 + p\beta + r \].
4Step 4: Evaluate \(\alpha^2 + p\alpha + r\) and \(\beta^2 + p\beta + r\)
Since \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are roots of \(x^2 + px - q = 0\), it follows that:\[ \alpha^2 + p\alpha = q \] and \[ \beta^2 + p\beta = q \].Therefore, substitute \(q\) for these expressions:\[(\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta) = q + r\],\[(\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta) = q + r\].
5Step 5: Simplify the Expression
We now have that \[ \frac{(\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta)}{(\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta)} = \frac{q + r}{q + r} = 1 \].
6Step 6: Conclusion: Final Result
The resultant value is 1, which corresponds to option (A).
Key Concepts
Vieta's FormulasRoots of Quadratic EquationAlgebraic Manipulation
Vieta's Formulas
Vieta's Formulas are a helpful tool to deal with quadratic equations, especially when working with roots. For a quadratic equation in the form \( ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \), Vieta's Formulas allows us to find relationships between the coefficients of the equation and its roots, usually denoted as \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \). Here’s what Vieta's Formulas tell us:
This simplification can guide further algebraic manipulation when dealing with expressions involving these roots.
- The sum of the roots \( \alpha + \beta \) is given by \( -\frac{b}{a} \).
- The product of the roots \( \alpha \beta \) is given by \( \frac{c}{a} \).
This simplification can guide further algebraic manipulation when dealing with expressions involving these roots.
Roots of Quadratic Equation
The roots of a quadratic equation, such as \( x^2 + px = 0 \), are values of \( x \) that make the equation equal zero. In other words, they are where the graph of the equation intersects the x-axis. For any quadratic equation in the form \( ax^2 + bx + c = 0 \), the roots can be found using the quadratic formula:
- \( x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} \)
- If the discriminant is positive, there are two distinct real roots.
- If the discriminant is zero, there is exactly one real root (a double root).
- If the discriminant is negative, the roots are complex and come in conjugate pairs.
Algebraic Manipulation
Algebraic manipulation involves rewriting mathematical expressions in different forms to reveal insightful properties or to simplify calculations. For example, simplifying expressions involving roots of quadratic equations often requires skilled manipulation.
In our exercise, to solve \[ \frac{(\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta)}{(\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta)} \], we started by expressing terms like \( (\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta) \) using the relation \( (x - \gamma)(x - \delta) = x^2 - (\gamma + \delta)x + \gamma\delta \). By setting \( x \) as each of \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \), and substituting values from Vieta's Formulas, we identified connections between original expressions and derived ones.
This kind of manipulation is invaluable, particularly in transforming complex problems into manageable solutions. By aligning the original expressions with known formulas, we simplified \( \alpha^2 + p\alpha = q \) and \( \beta^2 + p\beta = q \), eventually allowing us to show that the expression simplifies to 1 by division.
In our exercise, to solve \[ \frac{(\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta)}{(\beta - \gamma)(\beta - \delta)} \], we started by expressing terms like \( (\alpha - \gamma)(\alpha - \delta) \) using the relation \( (x - \gamma)(x - \delta) = x^2 - (\gamma + \delta)x + \gamma\delta \). By setting \( x \) as each of \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \), and substituting values from Vieta's Formulas, we identified connections between original expressions and derived ones.
This kind of manipulation is invaluable, particularly in transforming complex problems into manageable solutions. By aligning the original expressions with known formulas, we simplified \( \alpha^2 + p\alpha = q \) and \( \beta^2 + p\beta = q \), eventually allowing us to show that the expression simplifies to 1 by division.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 28
Number of solutions of \(\log _{2}\left(9-2^{x}\right)=10^{\log _{s}(3-x)}\) is (A) 1 (B) 2 (C) 3 (D) None of these
View solution Problem 29
If \(a x^{2}+b x+6=0\) does not have two distinct real roots \(a \in R, b \in R\), then the least value of \(3 a+b\) is (A) 4 (B) \(-1\) (C) 1 (D) \(-2\)
View solution Problem 31
Number of integral solutions of \(\frac{x+2}{x^{2}+1}>\frac{1}{2}\) is (A) 0 (B) 1 (C) 2 (D) 3
View solution Problem 32
If the ratio of the roots of \(\lambda x^{2}+\mu x+v=0\) is equal to the ratio of the roots of \(x^{2}+x+1=0\), then \(\lambda, \mu, v\) are in (A) A.P. (B) G.P
View solution