Problem 29
Question
Suppose that each of the \(n\) \((n \geq 2)\) people in a room shakes hands with everyone else, but not with himself. Show that the number of handshakes is \(\frac{n^{2}-n}{2}\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The number of handshakes is \(\frac{n^{2}-n}{2}\).
1Step 1: Identify the problem
We need to find the total number of handshakes among \(n\) people where each person shakes hands with every other person exactly once.
2Step 2: Understand the handshake condition
Each person shakes hands with \(n-1\) others, since they don't shake hands with themselves.
3Step 3: Compute total possible handshakes without double counting
Initially, if each of the \(n\) people shakes hands with \(n-1\) others, the product is \(n \times (n-1)\). However, this counts each handshake twice (once for each participant), so we must divide by 2.
4Step 4: Simplify the expression
The total number of distinct handshakes can be written as \(\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\). Simplifying: \(\frac{n^2 - n}{2}\).
Key Concepts
Understanding the Handshake ProblemThe Role of Discrete MathematicsThe Importance of Mathematical Proofs
Understanding the Handshake Problem
The handshake problem is a popular example used to illustrate key concepts in combinatorics. Imagine you're at a party with several friends. Each person shakes hands with everyone else once. We want to find how many total handshakes occur. This problem assumes each individual shakes hands but not with themselves.
To solve this, we consider:
This correction gives us the equation for the number of handshakes as \(\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) which simplifies to \(\frac{n^2-n}{2}\). This formula only counts each handshake once and applies to any group of \(n\) people.
To solve this, we consider:
- Every person in the room shakes hands with others, except themselves.
- If there are \(n\) people, each person shakes hands with \(n-1\) others.
- Thus, the initial calculation might suggest that there should be \(n \times (n-1)\) handshakes.
This correction gives us the equation for the number of handshakes as \(\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) which simplifies to \(\frac{n^2-n}{2}\). This formula only counts each handshake once and applies to any group of \(n\) people.
The Role of Discrete Mathematics
Discrete mathematics plays a crucial role in understanding and solving the handshake problem. It's the branch of mathematics dealing with countable, distinct elements. These can be finite or infinite, but they aren't continuous. Instead, discrete mathematics focuses on structures like graphs and numbers.
Why is it essential here? The handshake problem deals with entities that we can count distinctly - people and handshakes, making it a classic discrete mathematics problem. Some key points to understand include:
Why is it essential here? The handshake problem deals with entities that we can count distinctly - people and handshakes, making it a classic discrete mathematics problem. Some key points to understand include:
- Combinatorics: This is used to count and arrange elements without actually listing them all.
- Relations: A handshake between two people is a direct example of a relation.
- Graph Theory: This field within discrete math often uses vertices (people) and edges (handshakes) to visualize and solve problems like this.
The Importance of Mathematical Proofs
Mathematical proofs are foundational in validating solutions, like our handshake problem. A proof logically shows that a proposition is true, leaving no room for error or doubt. It's crucial for verifying that a formula correctly solves a problem.
In the handshake problem, our solution formula, \(\frac{n^2-n}{2}\), isn't just made up. It’s derived step by step and can be verified through proof. Here's how proofs fit into this context:
In the handshake problem, our solution formula, \(\frac{n^2-n}{2}\), isn't just made up. It’s derived step by step and can be verified through proof. Here's how proofs fit into this context:
- Precision: A proof meticulously illustrates why the formula applies to all \(n \geq 2\).
- Understanding: Following the proof aids in understanding why each step leads logically to the next.
- Verification: A mathematical proof ensures we didn’t overlook counting methods, like not double-counting handshakes.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 29
Use the binomial theorem to expand each expression. $$ \left(2 p^{3}-3\right)^{3} $$
View solution Problem 29
Find the probability of the compound event. Drawing four consecutive aces from a standard deck of 52 cards without replacement
View solution Problem 29
The first five terms of an arithmetic sequence are given. Find (a) numerical, (b) graphical, and (c) symbolic representations of the sequence. Include at least
View solution Problem 29
Evaluate the expression. \(10 !\)
View solution