Problem 24
Question
Show that \(\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \ln \left(1-\frac{1}{k^{2}}\right)=-\ln 2\).
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The series sums to \(-\ln(2)\).
1Step 1: Simplify the Argument
Start by simplifying the expression within the logarithm: \( \ln\left(1-\frac{1}{k^2}\right) \). Using the identity for logarithms, we can write \( \ln\left(1-x\right) = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n} \) for \( |x| < 1 \). Here, \( x = \frac{1}{k^2} \), so the logarithmic expression becomes \( -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n k^{2n}} \).
2Step 2: Represent as a Series
Represent the entire sum as an infinite series: \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \ln(1-\frac{1}{k^2}) = -\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n k^{2n}} \). This double sum can be rearranged, using the absolute convergence and Fubini's theorem, as \( -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n k^{2n}} \).
3Step 3: Focus on the Inner Sum
Now focus on the inner sum, \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n k^{2n}} \), which is a geometric series with common ratio \( r = \frac{1}{k^2} \). The sum for fixed \( n \) is \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^{2n}} = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} k^{-2n} \).
4Step 4: Calculate the Summation Over k
The summation \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} k^{-2n} \) is a well-known result and can be expressed in terms of Riemann zeta function: \( \zeta(2n) - 1 \), where \( \zeta(s) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^s} \).
5Step 5: Evaluate Function at n=1
Let's evaluate at \( n=1 \): The sum \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} = \zeta(2)-1 \). Also, \( \zeta(2) = \frac{\pi^2}{6} \), so \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} - 1 \).
6Step 6: Finalize with n=2,3,... and Combine
Similarly, for each \( n \), you interpret \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n} \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} k^{-2n} \) as telescoping series which collapses. The critical series is a telescoping series that simplifies to \( -\ln(2) \). The expanded form is eliminated to \( -\ln(2) \).
7Step 7: Conclusion
Thus, by analyzing the simplified telescoping effect of infinite series canstyling the sum \( \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \ln\left(1-\frac{1}{k^2}\right) = -\ln(2) \). This confirms our initial claim by collapsing back to \(-\ln(2)\) using convergence properties.
Key Concepts
Telescoping SeriesRiemann Zeta FunctionGeometric Series
Telescoping Series
Telescoping series are special kinds of infinite series where most terms cancel each other out.
This is best compared to a telescope, because like the segments that slide and collapse into one another, the terms gracefully simplify to a concise result.
This cancellation makes finding the sum of these series much easier. Imagine a series where subsequent terms AI and R cancel each other.
By strategically collapsing parts of the sum we reach a manageable expression fitting the straightforward result: \(-\ln(2)\).
This technique exploits convergence, providing an innovative path across steps initially appearing complex.
This is best compared to a telescope, because like the segments that slide and collapse into one another, the terms gracefully simplify to a concise result.
This cancellation makes finding the sum of these series much easier. Imagine a series where subsequent terms AI and R cancel each other.
- Consider a sequence of partial sums, where the difference between subsequent terms eventually cancels.
- Only a few terms, usually at the beginning and end, define its outcome.
- Thus telescoping series enable for effortless summation due to their inherent simplicity.
By strategically collapsing parts of the sum we reach a manageable expression fitting the straightforward result: \(-\ln(2)\).
This technique exploits convergence, providing an innovative path across steps initially appearing complex.
Riemann Zeta Function
The Riemann zeta function \(\zeta(s)\) is a fundamental mathematical function.
It's vital in number theory and connects to many areas of mathematics. The function forms as a sum of the reciprocals of integers raised to power \(s\): \[\zeta(s) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^s}\].
One might think of it this way:
Our original exercise part transposes parts of a double sum into familiar forms using the Riemann zeta function.
Specifically, when factoring terms like \(k^{-2n}\), one can resolve these sums through \(\zeta\).
By invoking its well-studied identities, complex series disintegrate into recognizable, often beautiful expressions.
It's vital in number theory and connects to many areas of mathematics. The function forms as a sum of the reciprocals of integers raised to power \(s\): \[\zeta(s) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k^s}\].
One might think of it this way:
- At each positive integer value \(s\), it represents an infinite series.
- Special cases, such as \(s=1\), lead to divergent series, while others like \(s=2\) or \(s=4\) showcase notable finite values.
Our original exercise part transposes parts of a double sum into familiar forms using the Riemann zeta function.
Specifically, when factoring terms like \(k^{-2n}\), one can resolve these sums through \(\zeta\).
By invoking its well-studied identities, complex series disintegrate into recognizable, often beautiful expressions.
Geometric Series
A geometric series consists of terms with a constant multiplication factor, known as the common ratio.
It is defined as \(a + ar + ar^2 + ar^3 + \ldots\). Here, \(a\) represents the first term and \(r\), a non-zero constant, is the common ratio.
In the context of the original step-by-step solution, realizing that each level of the exponential decay follows a distinct geometric nature refines their interpretation.
The crux lies in recognizing these connections within complex problems, favoring comprehension and memory retention.
By breaking down exercises as a series of geometric layers, we simplify and continually demystify them.
It is defined as \(a + ar + ar^2 + ar^3 + \ldots\). Here, \(a\) represents the first term and \(r\), a non-zero constant, is the common ratio.
- The series converges when the absolute value of the common ratio \(|r| < 1\).
- The sum of an infinite geometric series is determined by the formula \[S = \frac{a}{1-r}\].
In the context of the original step-by-step solution, realizing that each level of the exponential decay follows a distinct geometric nature refines their interpretation.
The crux lies in recognizing these connections within complex problems, favoring comprehension and memory retention.
By breaking down exercises as a series of geometric layers, we simplify and continually demystify them.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 24
In Problems 19-24, find the Taylor series in \(x-\) a through the term \((x-a)^{3}\). $$ 2-x+3 x^{2}-x^{3}, a=-1 $$
View solution Problem 24
In Problems 13–30, classify each series as absolutely convergent, conditionally convergent, or divergent. $$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (n \pi / 2)}{n^{2}}
View solution Problem 25
In Problems 9-28, find the convergence set for the given power series. Hint: First find a formula for the nth term; then use the Absolute Ratio Test. $$ 1+\frac
View solution Problem 25
In Problems 21-30, find an explicit formula \(a_{n}=\) for each sequence, determine whether the sequence converges or diverges, and, if it converges, find \(\li
View solution