Problem 22
Question
Predict the molecular structure (including bond angles) for each of the following. a. \(\mathrm{PCl}_{3}\) b. \(\mathrm{SCl}_{2}\) c. \(\mathrm{SiF}_{4}\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The molecular structures and bond angles for the given compounds are:
a. \(\mathrm{PCl}_{3}\): Trigonal pyramidal geometry with bond angles of around \(109.5^{\circ}\).
b. \(\mathrm{SCl}_{2}\): Bent or v-shaped geometry with bond angles of around \(104.5^{\circ}\).
c. \(\mathrm{SiF}_{4}\): Tetrahedral geometry with bond angles of around \(109.5^{\circ}\).
1Step 1: a. Predicting the molecular structure and bond angles for \(\mathrm{PCl}_{3}\)
1. Central atom: Phosphorus (P) is the central atom, as it is less electronegative than Chlorine (Cl).
2. Bonding electron pairs: \(3\) P-Cl bonds, making it \(3\) bonding electron pairs.
3. Lone electron pairs: To find the number of lone pairs, first determine the number of valence electrons for P and Cl. P has \(5\) valence electrons, and each Cl has \(7\). Since there are \(3\) Cl atoms, the total number of electrons is \((5 + 3\times 7) = 26\). Subtract \(3\times2\) electrons from the bonds, which leaves \(20\) electrons in \(10\) lone pairs. Two lone pairs are on the central atom P, and the others are on the Cl atoms.
4. With \(3\) bonding pairs and \(1\) lone pair on the central atom, we have a tetrahedral arrangement of electron pairs, a "trigonal pyramidal" molecular geometry, and bond angles of around \(109.5^{\circ}\).
2Step 2: b. Predicting the molecular structure and bond angles for \(\mathrm{SCl}_{2}\)
1. Central atom: Sulfur (S) is the central atom, as it is less electronegative than Chlorine (Cl).
2. Bonding electron pairs: \(2\) S-Cl bonds, making it \(2\) bonding electron pairs.
3. Lone electron pairs: To find the number of lone pairs, first determine the number of valence electrons for S and Cl. S has \(6\) valence electrons, and each Cl has \(7\). Since there are \(2\) Cl atoms, the total number of electrons is \((6 + 2\times 7) = 20\). Subtract \(2\times2\) electrons from the bonds, which leaves \(16\) electrons in \(8\) lone pairs. Two lone pairs are on the central atom S, and the others are on the Cl atoms.
4. With \(2\) bonding pairs and \(2\) lone pairs on the central atom, we have a tetrahedral arrangement of electron pairs, a "bent" or "v-shaped" molecular geometry, and bond angles of around \(104.5^{\circ}\).
3Step 3: c. Predicting the molecular structure and bond angles for \(\mathrm{SiF}_{4}\)
1. Central atom: Silicon (Si) is the central atom, as it is less electronegative than Fluorine (F).
2. Bonding electron pairs: \(4\) Si-F bonds, making it \(4\) bonding electron pairs.
3. Lone electron pairs: To find the number of lone pairs, first determine the number of valence electrons for Si and F. Si has \(4\) valence electrons, and each F has \(7\). Since there are \(4\) F atoms, the total number of electrons is \((4 + 4\times 7) = 28\). Subtract \(4\times 2\) electrons from the bonds, which leaves \(20\) electrons in \(10\) lone pairs. There are no lone pairs on the central atom Si, the others are on the F atoms.
4. With \(4\) bonding pairs and no lone pairs on the central atom, we have a tetrahedral arrangement of electron pairs, a "tetrahedral" molecular geometry, and bond angles of around \(109.5^{\circ}\).
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 19
Why does the molecular orbital model do a better job in explaining the bonding in \(\mathrm{NO}^{-}\) and \(\mathrm{NO}\) than the hybrid orbital model?
View solution Problem 20
The three NO bonds in \(\mathrm{NO}_{3}^{-}\) are all equivalent in length and strength. How is this explained even though any valid Lewis structure for \(\math
View solution Problem 27
Predict the molecular structure (including bond angles) for each of the following. (See Exercises 25 and \(26 .\) ) a. \(\mathrm{XeCl}_{2}\) b. ICl \(_{3}\) c.
View solution Problem 28
Predict the molecular structure (including bond angles) for each of the following. (See Exercises 25 and \(26 .\) ) a. ICls b. \(\mathrm{XeCl}_{4}\) c. \(\mathr
View solution