Problem 21
Question
Use the precise definition of a limit to prove the following limits. $$\lim _{x \rightarrow 4} \frac{x^{2}-16}{x-4}=8 \text { (Hint: Factor and simplify.) }$$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
Answer: The limit of the function \(\frac{x^{2}-16}{x-4}\) as x approaches 4 is 8.
1Step 1: Rewrite the function using factoring
In order to simplify the given expression, we need to factor the numerator. Given a difference of squares \(\left(a^{2} - b^{2}\right)\), we can use the formula \(\left(a^{2} - b^{2}\right) = (a+b) (a-b)\).
Here, the numerator is \(x^2 - 16\). We can rewrite it as \((x+4)(x-4)\) since \(a=x\) and \(b=4\). Now, the function becomes:
$$\frac{(x+4)(x-4)}{x-4}$$
2Step 2: Simplify the function
We can now simplify the function by canceling out the common terms in both the numerator and the denominator:
$$\frac{(x+4)(x-4)}{x-4} = x+4$$
The function has been simplified to \(x + 4\).
3Step 3: Apply the limit
Now that we have simplified the function, we can apply the limit as x approaches 4:
$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 4} (x + 4) $$
4Step 4: Prove the limit
Applying the limit of x approaches 4, we simply substitute 4 into the function:
$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 4} (x + 4) = 4 + 4 = 8$$
We have shown that the given limit is equal to 8:
$$\lim_{x \rightarrow 4} \frac{x^{2}-16}{x-4} = 8$$
Key Concepts
FactoringDifference of SquaresSimplifying ExpressionsSubstitution Method
Factoring
Factoring is a crucial mathematical technique that simplifies complex expressions by breaking them down into products of simpler expressions. Imagine having a lump of clay that can be reshaped into smaller, manageable pieces—factoring does this with algebraic expressions.
In the context of our problem, we have the expression \(x^2 - 16\), which is a perfect example of the "difference of squares." This term stands for two squared numbers separated by a subtraction sign.
To factor such expressions, we use the formula \(a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)\).
In the context of our problem, we have the expression \(x^2 - 16\), which is a perfect example of the "difference of squares." This term stands for two squared numbers separated by a subtraction sign.
To factor such expressions, we use the formula \(a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)\).
- In "\(x^2 - 16\)," \(x^2\) is \(a^2\) and \(16\) is \(b^2\), so \(a = x\) and \(b = 4\).
- Applying the formula gives us \((x + 4)(x - 4)\), transforming the original problem into simpler parts.
Difference of Squares
The difference of squares is a special case of factoring that often occurs in algebraic problems. It's one of the simplest and most easily recognizable formulas in algebra.
When we say "difference of squares," we're referring to a format where two squared terms are subtracted, like \(x^2 - 16\). The great thing about this pattern is the consistent way it factors:
Knowing these shortcuts can make algebra much more manageable and less intimidating.
When we say "difference of squares," we're referring to a format where two squared terms are subtracted, like \(x^2 - 16\). The great thing about this pattern is the consistent way it factors:
- This expression \(x^2 - 16\) fits perfectly into the formula \(a^2 - b^2 = (a + b)(a - b)\), where the squares become apparent as \((x + 4)(x - 4)\).
Knowing these shortcuts can make algebra much more manageable and less intimidating.
Simplifying Expressions
After factoring an expression, simplifying it is the next logical step. Simplification involves reducing the expression to its most concise form by removing any unnecessary terms.
In our problem, after factoring \((x+4)(x-4)\), we encounter the same \((x-4)\) term in both the numerator and the denominator. This is a perfect opportunity for simplification:
In our problem, after factoring \((x+4)(x-4)\), we encounter the same \((x-4)\) term in both the numerator and the denominator. This is a perfect opportunity for simplification:
- The \((x-4)\) terms cancel each other out, leaving us with just \(x+4\).
Substitution Method
The substitution method is a fundamental technique for evaluating limits, particularly after simplifying an expression. This method involves replacing variables with specific values to compute a limit.
In this exercise, after simplifying the expression to \(x+4\), the task becomes straightforward. We simply substitute the value \(x=4\) into the expression:
Substitution is a direct and often final step, validating the process by proving the outcome of a limit after prior work in factoring and simplification.
In this exercise, after simplifying the expression to \(x+4\), the task becomes straightforward. We simply substitute the value \(x=4\) into the expression:
- Replace, \(x\) with \(4\) in \(x+4\), getting \(4+4\) which equals \(8\).
Substitution is a direct and often final step, validating the process by proving the outcome of a limit after prior work in factoring and simplification.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 21
Determining limits analytically Determine the following limits or state that they do not exist. a. \(\lim _{x \rightarrow 3^{+}} \frac{(x-1)(x-2)}{(x-3)}\) b. \
View solution Problem 21
Determine the following limits. $$\lim _{x \rightarrow-\infty}\left(-3 x^{16}+2\right)$$
View solution Problem 21
For the following position functions, make a table of average velocities similar to those in Exercises \(19-20\) and make a conjecture about the instantaneous v
View solution Problem 21
Assume \(\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} f(x)=8, \lim _{x \rightarrow 1} g(x)=3,\) and \(\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} h(x)=2 .\) Compute the following limits and state the l
View solution