Problem 2
Question
The data in Table 28.4 represent the duration of pregnancy for 1669 women who gave birth in a maternity hospital in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, in 1954 . The durations are measured in complete weeks from the beginning of the last menstrual period until delivery. The pregnancies are divided into those where an admission was booked for medical reasons, those booked for social reasons (such as poor housing), and unbooked emergency admissions. For the three groups the sample means and sample variances are Medical: \(\quad 775\) observations with \(\bar{x}=39.08\) and \(s^{2}=7.77\), Emergency: 261 observations with \(\bar{x}=37.59\) and \(s^{2}=25.33\), Social: \(\quad 633\) observations with \(\bar{x}=39.60\) and \(s^{2}=4.95\). Suppose we view the datasets as realizations of random samples from normal distributions with expectations \(\mu_{1}, \mu_{2}\), and \(\mu_{3}\) and variances \(\sigma_{1}^{2}, \sigma_{2}^{2}\), and \(\sigma_{3}^{2}\), where \(\mu_{i}\) represents the duration of pregnancy for the women from the \(i\) th group. We want to investigate whether the duration differs for the different groups. For each combination of two groups test the null hypothesis of equality of \(\mu_{i}\). Compute the values of the test statistic and report your conclusions.
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Pregnancy Duration
In the study at Newcastle-upon-Tyne, the pregnancy durations were gathered for different groups: Medical, Emergency, and Social. Each group had varying average durations:
- The Medical group had a mean duration of 39.08 weeks.
- The Emergency group's mean was 37.59 weeks.
- The Social group had the longest duration, with a mean of 39.60 weeks.
T-Test
In our exercise, the t-test helps in comparing the mean pregnancy durations between different groups:
- Medical vs Emergency: Here, the calculated t-value was 3.618, indicating a significant difference in mean durations.
- Medical vs Social: The t-value obtained was -2.746, pointing to a significant difference as well.
- Emergency vs Social: With a t-value of -3.140, there is evidence of a significant mean difference.
Significance Level
In the context of our problem, the significance level was set at \( \alpha = 0.05 \). A two-tailed test approach was adopted, implying that we are interested in deviations in both directions from the null value.
- If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value derived from statistical tables (depending on degrees of freedom), the null hypothesis is rejected.
- The significance level determines the critical t-values. For \( \alpha = 0.05 \), smaller critical values mean higher statistical evidence against the null hypothesis.
- All t-values (3.618, -2.746, -3.140) exceeded the critical values, leading to the rejection of null hypotheses across all groups.