Problem 2
Question
Melita said that the equation \(4(3)^{x}=72\) could be solved by writing the logarithmic equation \(x \log 12=\log 72 .\) Do you agree with Melita? Explain why or why not.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
No, Melita's equation is incorrect; bases do not match.
1Step 1: Analyze the Given Equation
We start with the equation \(4(3)^x = 72\). Here, we want to solve for \(x\). First, we divide both sides of the equation by 4 to simplify it. This yields:\[(3)^x = \frac{72}{4}\]\(\Rightarrow (3)^x = 18\).
2Step 2: Align Equation with Logarithmic Form
Next, we want to express this exponential equation in logarithmic form. We know that \(b^y = z\) can be rewritten as \(y = \log_b(z)\). Therefore, expressing \((3)^x = 18\) in logarithmic form, we get:\[x = \log_3(18)\]
3Step 3: Compare with Melita’s Logarithmic Equation
Now, consider Melita’s proposed equation: \(x \log 12 = \log 72\). For Melita's equation to correctly represent our transformed equation, we expect both to logically equate to \(x\). First, review \(\log_3(18)\) from Step 2.\[x = \frac{\log 18}{\log 3}\]Breaking down Melita's: \[x = \frac{\log 72}{\log 12}\]Melita’s setup equates to an entirely different base and argument, and it is not equivalent to the standard conversion from \((3)^x = 18\) solved above.
Key Concepts
logarithmic formsolving equationsbase conversion
logarithmic form
When dealing with exponential equations, it is often useful to convert them into a logarithmic form. This conversion simplifies solving for unknowns. Logarithmic form is based on the relationship between exponents and logarithms:
This conversion is a powerful tool in simplifying equations and understanding relationships between quantities.Converting to logarithmic form can make seemingly complex problems easier to handle.
- If you have an exponential equation in the form of \(b^y = z\), it can be rewritten as \(y = \log_b(z)\).
- This means you are solving for the exponent, \(y\), by finding the logarithm of \(z\) with base \(b\).
This conversion is a powerful tool in simplifying equations and understanding relationships between quantities.Converting to logarithmic form can make seemingly complex problems easier to handle.
solving equations
Solving equations involves finding an unknown variable that makes the equation true. In exponential equations like \(4(3)^x = 72\), methods such as dividing out constants and using logarithms are frequently used.
Here's how we approach solving this specific equation:
Solving equations is a fundamental skill in algebra, requiring analytical thinking and a clear understanding of mathematical properties.
Breaking down equations into simpler steps increases accuracy and comprehension.
Here's how we approach solving this specific equation:
- First, simplify by dividing both sides by 4, giving \((3)^x = 18\).
- Next, express the exponential form in logarithmic terms to find \(x\).
Solving equations is a fundamental skill in algebra, requiring analytical thinking and a clear understanding of mathematical properties.
Breaking down equations into simpler steps increases accuracy and comprehension.
base conversion
In the context of logarithms, base conversion is the method used to change from one base to another. Often, logarithms are calculated in one base, like 10 or \(e\), even when the original problem uses a different base.
To convert a logarithm from one base to another, use the change of base formula:
This conversion allows flexibility in calculating logarithmic values using standard calculators.
A thorough understanding of base conversion is vital, as it often facilitates easier computation and clearer interpretation of logarithmic expressions.
To convert a logarithm from one base to another, use the change of base formula:
- For any logarithm \(\log_b(a)\), it can be rewritten as \(\frac{\log_k(a)}{\log_k(b)}\), where \(k\) is the new base.
This conversion allows flexibility in calculating logarithmic values using standard calculators.
A thorough understanding of base conversion is vital, as it often facilitates easier computation and clearer interpretation of logarithmic expressions.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 1
Show that for all \(a>0\) and \(a \neq 1, \log _{a} a^{n}=n\)
View solution Problem 1
Peg said that \((1,0)\) is always a point on the graph of \(y=\log _{b} x .\) Do you agree with Peg? Explain why or why not.
View solution Problem 2
For what value of \(a\) does \(\log a=\ln a ?\) Justify your answer.
View solution Problem 2
Pritha said that before an equation such as \(\log x=1+\log 5\) can be solved, 1 could be written as \(\log 10 .\) Do you agree with Pritha? Explain why or why
View solution