Problem 2
Question
In any ordered integral domain, define \(|a|\) by $$ |a|=\left\\{\begin{array}{rll} a & \text { if } & a \geq 0 \\ -a & \text { if } & a<0 \end{array}\right. $$ Using this definition, prove the following: $$ a \leq|a| $$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
For all values, \(a \leq |a|\) by definition: when positive, \(a=|a|\); when negative, \(a\leq-a=|a|\).
1Step 1: Understanding the Absolute Value Definition
The exercise provides the definition of the absolute value function for any element \(a\) in an ordered integral domain: \(|a|\) is \(a\) if \(a\geq0\), and \(-a\) if \(a<0\). This definition will be used to prove that \(a \leq |a|\).
2Step 2: Case 1: Non-Negative \(a\)
Consider the case where \(a \geq 0\). According to the definition, \(|a| = a\). With the inequality \(a \leq |a|\), replacing \(|a|\) with \(a\) results in \(a \leq a\), which is always true.
3Step 3: Case 2: Negative \(a\)
Now consider the case where \(a < 0\). Here, \(|a| = -a\). We need to show that \(a \leq -a\). Since \(a < 0\), it follows that \(-a > 0\). Clearly, \(a\), being negative, is less than any positive number, hence \(a \leq -a\).
4Step 4: Combine Case Analyses
With both cases analyzed — when \(a \geq 0\) and \(a < 0\) — the statement \(a \leq |a|\) holds true in both scenarios, thereby proving the equation for any element \(a\) in the domain.
Key Concepts
Absolute Value in Ordered Integral DomainsProof of the Inequality \(a \leq |a|\)Utilizing Case Analysis in Problem Solving
Absolute Value in Ordered Integral Domains
In an ordered integral domain, understanding the concept of absolute value is essential. The absolute value of a number, denoted as \(|a|\), represents the non-negative magnitude of that number. It is defined as follows: if \(a\) is greater than or equal to zero, then the absolute value \(|a|\) is simply \(a\) itself. However, if \(a\) is less than zero, its absolute value becomes the opposite \(-a\), effectively making it positive.
This definition ensures that absolute values are always non-negative:
This definition ensures that absolute values are always non-negative:
- For \(a \geq 0\): \(|a| = a\)
- For \(a < 0\): \(|a| = -a\)
Proof of the Inequality \(a \leq |a|\)
One fundamental property of absolute value is the inequality \(a \leq |a|\). This can be proven using the definition of absolute value and considering two separate cases based on the sign of \(a\). Let's dive in.
**Case 1: \(a \geq 0\)**In this scenario, since \(a\) is non-negative, the absolute value definition gives us \(|a| = a\). The inequality \(a \leq |a|\) simplifies to \(a \leq a\), which is trivially true. Every number is equal to itself, ensuring this part of the proof is valid.
**Case 2: \(a < 0\)**Here, \(a\) is negative, so by definition, \(|a| = -a\), turning \(a\) into a positive quantity. Given \(a < 0\), we naturally have \(-a > 0\). For any negative number \(a\), the inequality \(a \leq -a\) holds, since a negative number \(a\) is always less than any positive number such as \(-a\).
Combining these two cases confirms the inequality \(a \leq |a|\) is universally true for any element \(a\) in an ordered integral domain.
**Case 1: \(a \geq 0\)**In this scenario, since \(a\) is non-negative, the absolute value definition gives us \(|a| = a\). The inequality \(a \leq |a|\) simplifies to \(a \leq a\), which is trivially true. Every number is equal to itself, ensuring this part of the proof is valid.
**Case 2: \(a < 0\)**Here, \(a\) is negative, so by definition, \(|a| = -a\), turning \(a\) into a positive quantity. Given \(a < 0\), we naturally have \(-a > 0\). For any negative number \(a\), the inequality \(a \leq -a\) holds, since a negative number \(a\) is always less than any positive number such as \(-a\).
Combining these two cases confirms the inequality \(a \leq |a|\) is universally true for any element \(a\) in an ordered integral domain.
Utilizing Case Analysis in Problem Solving
Case analysis is a powerful method of proof, especially when dealing with definitions that depend on conditions, such as the absolute value function. By splitting a problem into distinct cases, we can address each condition independently. Here, our approach involved considering \(a\) being non-negative in one instance, and negative in another.
- Specific Conditions: Define scenarios based on meaningful conditions, e.g., \(a \geq 0\) and \(a < 0\).
- Independent Proofs: Prove your statement independently within each case.
- Combine Results: Ensure that every possible scenario is accounted for by using conclusions from all individual cases.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 2
The purpose of this exercise is to give rigorous proofs (using induction) of the basic identities involved in the use of exponents or multiples. If \(A\) is a r
View solution Problem 2
Prove the following, where \(\mathrm{k}, \mathrm{m}, \mathrm{n}, \mathrm{q}\), and \(\mathrm{r}\) designate integers. Let \(\mathrm{n}>0\) and \(\mathrm{k}>0\).
View solution Problem 2
Let \(A\) be an ordered integral domain. Prove the following, for all \(a, b\), and \(c\) in \(A\). $$ 1^{3}+2^{3}+\cdots+n^{3}=(1+2+\cdots+n)^{2} $$
View solution Problem 3
The purpose of this exercise is to give rigorous proofs (using induction) of the basic identities involved in the use of exponents or multiples. If \(A\) is a r
View solution