Problem 19
Question
The quantity of a product demanded by consumers is a function of its price. The quantity of one product demanded may also depend on the price of other products. For example, the demand for tea is affected by the price of coffee; the demand for cars is affected by the price of gas. The quantities demanded, \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\), of two products depend on their prices, \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\), as follows: $$ \begin{array}{l} q_{1}=150-2 p_{1}-p_{2} \\ q_{2}=200-p_{1}-3 p_{2} \end{array} $$ (a) What does the fact that the coefficients of \(p_{1}\) and \(p_{2}\) are negative tell you? Give an example of two products that might be related this way. (b) If one manufacturer sells both products, how should the prices be set to generate the maximum possible revenue? What is that maximum possible revenue?
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Price Elasticity
In our original exercise, the negative coefficients in the demand functions \(q_1 = 150 - 2p_1 - p_2\) and \(q_2 = 200 - p_1 - 3p_2\) indicate the price elasticity of demand. It shows that for both products, an increase in price decreases the quantity demanded, which is consistent with the law of demand. These equations reveal the inverse relationship between price and quantity, a key feature of elastic demand.
Substitute Goods
In the exercise, the demand functions \(q_1 = 150 - 2p_1 - p_2\) and \(q_2 = 200 - p_1 - 3p_2\) reflect the presence of substitute goods. Here, an increase in the price of one product affects the demand for the other product. Therefore, the coefficients in front of \(p_2\) in \(q_1\) and \(p_1\) in \(q_2\) illustrate the cross-price elasticity, where the price of one good impacts the demand for another. This interdependence highlights the concept of substitute goods.
Revenue Maximization
In the given exercise, the revenue function, \[R = -2p_1^2 - 3p_2^2 - 2p_1p_2 + 150p_1 + 200p_2\], illustrates the total revenue derived from the two products. To find the optimal prices for revenue maximization, it's essential to differentiate the revenue function with respect to prices \(p_1\) and \(p_2\), set these derivatives to zero, and then solve the resulting equations for the optimal price points. This leads to calculating \(p_1 = 40\) and \(p_2 = 30\), which, after substituting back into the demand functions, yield a maximum revenue of 3400.
This process highlights the importance of calculus in finding peak revenue conditions and demonstrates how a strategic pricing approach can significantly impact business profitability.