Problem 17
Question
Use the method of proof by contradiction to prove the following statements. (In each case, you should also think about how a direct or contrapositive proof would work. You will find in most cases that proof by contradiction is easier.) For every \(n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4 \nmid\left(n^{2}+2\right)\)
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
By contradiction, it has been proven that for every \(n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4 \nmid\left(n^{2}+2\right)\).
1Step 1: Assumption
Assume the opposite of what is to be proven: there exists an integer \(n\) such that \(4\) divides \(n^{2}+2\), which means there exists a \(k \in \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(n^{2}+2 = 4k\).
2Step 2: Identify possible values of \(n^{2}\mod 4\)
We know that for every integer \(n\), \(n^{2} = 0 \mod 4\) or \(n^{2} = 1 \mod 4\). Therefore, \(n^{2}+2 = 2\mod 4\) or \(n^{2}+2 = 3\mod 4\).
3Step 3: Search for Contradiction
We can see that the results we got in the last step contradict with our assumption in Step 1. Therefore, our assumption is false and the initial statement is proven.
4Step 4: Conclusion
Hence, by contradiction, it has been proven that for every \(n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4 \nmid\left(n^{2}+2\right)\).
Key Concepts
Integer DivisionModular ArithmeticLogical Reasoning
Integer Division
In mathematics, integer division is the process of dividing two integers and getting an integer result, disregarding any present remainder. When we say "4 divides", we mean there is some integer that, when multiplied by 4, gives us the number in question. Consider a simple example where 8 divided by 4 gives us exactly 2, with no remainder.
In the context of the exercise, we are tasked with proving that for any integer \( n \), 4 cannot divide \( n^2 + 2 \). If 4 divides \( n^2 + 2 \), then there exists some integer \( k \) such that \( n^2 + 2 = 4k \).
This assumption sets the groundwork for a proof by contradiction, which helps us explore whether this argument holds or if we can find inconsistencies.
In the context of the exercise, we are tasked with proving that for any integer \( n \), 4 cannot divide \( n^2 + 2 \). If 4 divides \( n^2 + 2 \), then there exists some integer \( k \) such that \( n^2 + 2 = 4k \).
This assumption sets the groundwork for a proof by contradiction, which helps us explore whether this argument holds or if we can find inconsistencies.
- Integer division strictly deals with whole numbers.
- Any remainder is disregarded in the calculations.
- This concept is crucial for understanding divisibility in proofs.
Modular Arithmetic
Modular arithmetic is often described as "clock arithmetic" due to its cyclical nature. It involves the remainder when an integer is divided by another integer, referred to as the modulus. For instance, when we say \( n^2 \mod 4 \), we're looking at whether \( n^2 \) leaves a remainder of 0, 1, 2, or 3 when divided by 4.
In this exercise, we only examine the cases where \( n^2 \equiv 0 \mod 4 \) or \( n^2 \equiv 1 \mod 4 \), since squaring an integer results in a residue of either 0 or 1 with modulus 4.
This allows us to evaluate \( n^2 + 2 \mod 4 \), which simplifies further:
In this exercise, we only examine the cases where \( n^2 \equiv 0 \mod 4 \) or \( n^2 \equiv 1 \mod 4 \), since squaring an integer results in a residue of either 0 or 1 with modulus 4.
This allows us to evaluate \( n^2 + 2 \mod 4 \), which simplifies further:
- If \( n^2 \equiv 0 \mod 4 \), then \( n^2 + 2 \equiv 2 \mod 4 \).
- If \( n^2 \equiv 1 \mod 4 \), then \( n^2 + 2 \equiv 3 \mod 4 \).
Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the backbone of mathematical proof techniques such as proof by contradiction. When engaging in a proof by contradiction, we start by assuming the opposite of what we aim to prove. In our problem, we assumed that there is an integer \( n \) such that 4 divides \( n^2 + 2 \).
This assumption allows us to use logical reasoning involving the properties of dividers and modular arithmetic to test our hypothesis. By evaluating \( n^2 + 2 \) under possible values of \( n^2 \mod 4 \), we observed results that challenge our initial assumption.
The contradiction arises because our results (\( n^2 + 2 \equiv 2 \mod 4 \) or \( \equiv 3 \mod 4 \)) never align with \( n^2 + 2 \equiv 0 \mod 4 \), nullifying our assumption.
This assumption allows us to use logical reasoning involving the properties of dividers and modular arithmetic to test our hypothesis. By evaluating \( n^2 + 2 \) under possible values of \( n^2 \mod 4 \), we observed results that challenge our initial assumption.
The contradiction arises because our results (\( n^2 + 2 \equiv 2 \mod 4 \) or \( \equiv 3 \mod 4 \)) never align with \( n^2 + 2 \equiv 0 \mod 4 \), nullifying our assumption.
- Proof by contradiction demonstrates the impossibility of a false premise.
- This reasoning solidifies the truth of the statement through elimination.
- It leverages intrinsic properties of integers and remainders.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 15
Use the method of proof by contradiction to prove the following statements. (In each case, you should also think about how a direct or contrapositive proof woul
View solution Problem 16
Use the method of proof by contradiction to prove the following statements. (In each case, you should also think about how a direct or contrapositive proof woul
View solution Problem 18
For every \(n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4 \nmid\left(n^{2}+2\right)\). Suppose \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}\). If \(4 \mid\left(a^{2}+b^{2}\right),\) then \(a\) and \(b\) are no
View solution Problem 19
Prove the following statements using any method from Chapters 4,5 or 6 . The product of any five consecutive integers is divisible by 120 . (For example, the pr
View solution