Problem 15
Question
Give the simplest possible conclusion in each argument. Assume each premise is true. $$\begin{aligned} &p \rightarrow \sim q\\\ &\sim r \rightarrow q\\\ &p \end{aligned}$$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The simplest possible conclusion is \(r\) is true.
1Step 1: Write down the premises
We are given the following premises:
1. \(p \rightarrow \sim q\)
2. \(\sim r \rightarrow q\)
3. \(p\)
2Step 2: Apply Modus Ponens on Premise 1 and 3
Since we have \(p\) as a premise, we can apply Modus Ponens on premise 1 and 3:
If \(p\) is true, then \(\sim q\) is true.
So, now we know that \(\sim q\) is true.
3Step 3: Apply Modus Tollens on Premise 2 and \(\sim q\)
Now that we have deduced that \(\sim q\) is true, we can apply Modus Tollens on premise 2 and \(\sim q\):
If \(\sim q\) is true, then \(\sim (\sim r)\) is true, which implies that \(r\) is true.
So, now we know that \(r\) is true.
4Step 4: State the simplest possible conclusion
The simplest possible conclusion we can draw from the given premises is that \(r\) is true.
Key Concepts
Modus PonensModus TollensLogical Reasoning
Modus Ponens
Modus Ponens is a fundamental rule of inference in propositional logic. It allows us to conclude a statement when two initial conditions are satisfied:
For instance, in our exercise, we applied Modus Ponens using the premise \( p \rightarrow \sim q \) and the fact \( p \) is true. By Modus Ponens, we can infer that \( \sim q \) is true. This simple yet powerful rule facilitates progression in logical arguments and helps deduce new facts from given premises.
- An implication of the form \( p \rightarrow q \)
- The premise \( p \) is true
For instance, in our exercise, we applied Modus Ponens using the premise \( p \rightarrow \sim q \) and the fact \( p \) is true. By Modus Ponens, we can infer that \( \sim q \) is true. This simple yet powerful rule facilitates progression in logical arguments and helps deduce new facts from given premises.
Modus Tollens
Modus Tollens is another essential rule of inference in propositional logic. It comes into play when:
In the given exercise, after determining \( \sim q \) is true by Modus Ponens, we used Modus Tollens on the premises \( \sim r \rightarrow q \) and \( \sim q \). By inferring that \( \sim(\sim r) \) is true, we concluded that \( r \) is true. Modus Tollens is particularly useful when the result of a condition does not occur, leading us to negate the initial assumption.
- There is an implication of the form \( p \rightarrow q \)
- The negation of the conclusion \( \sim q \) is true
In the given exercise, after determining \( \sim q \) is true by Modus Ponens, we used Modus Tollens on the premises \( \sim r \rightarrow q \) and \( \sim q \). By inferring that \( \sim(\sim r) \) is true, we concluded that \( r \) is true. Modus Tollens is particularly useful when the result of a condition does not occur, leading us to negate the initial assumption.
Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is the process of using a structured and methodical approach to deduce new information or make decisions based on existing knowledge. In propositional logic, logical reasoning employs rules like Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens to draw conclusions from a set of premises.
In our exercise, logical reasoning involved identifying valid inference rules and applying them to the premises provided. We started with known implications and premises, then made logical deductions to arrive at a conclusion.
Good logical reasoning requires clear understanding of the relationships between propositions and ensures that each step is both valid and logically sound. This skill is invaluable in problem-solving across various disciplines, from mathematics and computer science to everyday decision-making.
In our exercise, logical reasoning involved identifying valid inference rules and applying them to the premises provided. We started with known implications and premises, then made logical deductions to arrive at a conclusion.
Good logical reasoning requires clear understanding of the relationships between propositions and ensures that each step is both valid and logically sound. This skill is invaluable in problem-solving across various disciplines, from mathematics and computer science to everyday decision-making.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 14
Rewrite each sentence symbolically, where \(P(x): x\) is a 16 -bit machine, \(\mathbf{Q}(x): x\) uses the ASCII" character set, and the UD = set of all computer
View solution Problem 15
Use De Morgan's laws to evaluate each boolean expression, where \(x=2\) \(y=5,\) and \(z=3\) $$\sim[(y
View solution Problem 15
Evaluate each boolean expression, where \(a=2, b=3, c=5,\) and \(d=7\). $$[\sim(a>b)] \vee[\sim(c
View solution Problem 15
Prove each using the law of the contrapositive. If the square of an integer is even, then the integer is even.
View solution