Problem 147
Question
Determine whether statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I can check inequalities by substituting 0 for the variable: When 0 belongs to the solution set. I should obtain a true statement, and when 0 does not belong to the solution set, I should obtain a false statement.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The statement is partially correct. It is true that when 0 is a part of the solution set for an inequality, replacing the variable with 0 will typically yield a true statement. However, this method can give inaccurate results if the solution set for the inequality spans a range of values, as the statement does not take into account all possible values of the variable.
1Step 1: Understanding the statement
The statement concerns the solving of inequalities by substituting the variable with 0. So, the first step is to understand that this method can only work under certain conditions. If zero falls within the solution set of an inequality, substituting the variable with zero will result in a true statement. However, if zero does not fall into the solution set, doing so will yield a false statement.
2Step 2: Discussing the validity of the statement
To validate the statement, we should consider whether always substituting 0 for the variable in an inequality can accurately determine the solution set. On the surface, the statement seems logical: if zero is part of the solution set for an inequality, then substituting the variable with zero should yield a true statement. However, using this reasoning without considering the whole solution set can lead to inaccurate results. For instance, if an inequality allows for a range of solutions, with zero only being one of the possible values, then checking with zero alone is insufficient.
3Step 3: Conclusion
After considering the method outlined in the statement, it is apparent that while it might work in some cases, it cannot be applied universally. Therefore, the statement can be considered partially correct. This is because it is not accurate to assume that the solution set for every inequality includes zero, nor is it accurate to assume that substituting zero for the variable will always yield a true or false statement that accurately reflects the solution set.
Key Concepts
Solution SetSubstitution MethodValidity of Mathematical Statements
Solution Set
A solution set is the complete collection of values that satisfy a given mathematical inequality or equation. When solving inequalities, we often describe this set either by listing its elements or by using an interval notation.
To determine if a number is part of the solution set of an inequality, substitute that number for the variable and see if the inequality holds true. For example, if we have the inequality \( x + 1 > 2 \), we can find the solution set by isolating \( x \) to get \( x > 1 \). The solution set, therefore, includes all numbers greater than 1.
To determine if a number is part of the solution set of an inequality, substitute that number for the variable and see if the inequality holds true. For example, if we have the inequality \( x + 1 > 2 \), we can find the solution set by isolating \( x \) to get \( x > 1 \). The solution set, therefore, includes all numbers greater than 1.
- 0 can be part of the solution set if substituting it into the inequality gives a true statement.
- It is essential to test the entire range of the solution set and not rely solely on checking individual numbers like 0.
Substitution Method
The substitution method is a technique often used to solve equations and inequalities. It involves replacing the variable with a specific number to check if it satisfies the inequality.
Substituting different numbers can help verify parts of the solution set. For instance, in solving \( x + 1 > 2 \), substitute various values for \( x \) such as 2, 3, and so forth, to check their validity. Each valid substitution will result in a true statement when plugged into the inequality expression.
Substituting different numbers can help verify parts of the solution set. For instance, in solving \( x + 1 > 2 \), substitute various values for \( x \) such as 2, 3, and so forth, to check their validity. Each valid substitution will result in a true statement when plugged into the inequality expression.
- An effective tool for checking if particular points belong to the solution set.
- Cannot by itself determine the entire solution set's range but can validate specific points within it.
Validity of Mathematical Statements
The validity of a mathematical statement refers to whether it holds true under specified conditions. For inequalities, this means seeing if certain numbers satisfy the inequality when substituted into it.
When we discuss the statement, "I can check inequalities by substituting 0 for the variable," it tells us about a method to test specific conditions—whether 0 falls within the solution set. Validity in this context implies substituting 0 should result in a true statement if 0 is part of the solution set.
When we discuss the statement, "I can check inequalities by substituting 0 for the variable," it tells us about a method to test specific conditions—whether 0 falls within the solution set. Validity in this context implies substituting 0 should result in a true statement if 0 is part of the solution set.
- Not every mathematical inequality or statement will include 0 in its solution set.
- Relying solely on 0 can be misleading if a comprehensive solution check is not conducted.
- Understanding both the concept of solution sets and substitution enhances the reliability of using specific values like 0 to test inequalities.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 146
Determine whether statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. I prefer interval notation over set-builder notation because it take
View solution Problem 146
A rectangular parking lot has a length that is 3 yards greater than the width. The area of the parking lot is 180 square yards. Find the length and the width.
View solution Problem 147
Each side of a square is lengthened by 3 inches. The area of this new, larger square is 64 square inches. Find the length of a side of the original square.
View solution Problem 148
Determine whether statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. In an inequality such as \(5 x+4
View solution