In summary, both functions \(f\) and \(g\) have zero values for their first-order partial derivatives and negative values for their pure second-order partial derivatives at the point (0,0), indicating no increasing or decreasing behavior and concavity in both x and y directions. However, function g has non-zero mixed second-order partial derivatives, which suggests a saddle-shaped surface near (0,0), whereas function f has a purely parabolic behavior with zero mixed second-order partial derivatives. This highlights the importance of considering mixed second-order partial derivatives when analyzing the behavior of functions near a point.
1Step 1: Calculate first-order partial derivatives of \(f(x, y)\)
\[
f_{x}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{(8 - x^2 - y^2)}}{\partial{x}} = -2x
\] \[
f_{y}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{(8 - x^2 - y^2)}}{\partial{y}} = -2y
\]
2Step 2: Calculate second-order partial derivatives of \(f(x, y)\)
\[
f_{xx}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{f_{x}(x, y)}}{\partial{x}} = \frac{\partial{(-2x)}}{\partial{x}} = -2
\] \[
f_{yy}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{f_{y}(x, y)}}{\partial{y}} = \frac{\partial{(-2y)}}{\partial{y}} = -2
\] \[
f_{xy}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{f_{x}(x, y)}}{\partial{y}} = \frac{\partial{(-2x)}}{\partial{y}} = 0
\] \[
f_{yx}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{f_{y}(x, y)}}{\partial{x}} = \frac{\partial{(-2y)}}{\partial{x}} = 0
\]
b. Evaluate each of the partial derivatives in (a) at the point (0,0)
3Step 3: Evaluate the partial derivatives of \(f(x, y)\) at point (0, 0)
To evaluate the partial derivatives at the point (0, 0), plug in x=0 and y=0 into the partial derivatives found in part (a): \[
f_{x}(0, 0) = -2(0) = 0
\] \[
f_{y}(0, 0) = -2(0) = 0
\] \[
f_{xx}(0, 0) = -2
\] \[
f_{yy}(0, 0) = -2
\] \[
f_{xy}(0, 0) = 0
\] \[
f_{yx}(0, 0) = 0
\]
c. What do the values in (b) suggest about the behavior of \(f\) near (0,0)\(?\) Plot a graph of \(f\) and compare what you see visually to what the values suggest.
Since both \(f_x(0,0)\) and \(f_y(0,0)\) are 0, there is neither increasing nor decreasing behavior of the function in either the x or y direction at the point (0,0). The second-order partial derivatives \(f_{xx}(0,0)\) and \(f_{yy}(0,0)\) are both negative, which indicates that the function shows concave down behavior (like an inverted bowl) along both x and y axes near (0,0). The graph of the function f would show a parabolic surface with downward curvature.
d. Determine \(g_x, g_y, g_{xx}, g_{yy}, g_{xy},\) and \(g_{yx}\)
Let's find the first and second order partial derivatives of the function g(x, y).
4Step 4: Calculate first-order partial derivatives of \(g(x, y)\)
\[
g_{x}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{(8 - x^2 + 4xy - y^2)}}{\partial{x}} = -2x + 4y
\] \[
g_{y}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{(8 - x^2 + 4xy - y^2)}}{\partial{y}} = 4x - 2y
\]
5Step 5: Calculate second-order partial derivatives of \(g(x, y)\)
\[
g_{xx}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{g_{x}(x, y)}}{\partial{x}} = \frac{\partial{(-2x + 4y)}}{\partial{x}} = -2
\] \[
g_{yy}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{g_{y}(x, y)}}{\partial{y}} = \frac{\partial{(4x - 2y)}}{\partial{y}} = -2
\] \[
g_{xy}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{g_{x}(x, y)}}{\partial{y}} = \frac{\partial{(-2x + 4y)}}{\partial{y}} = 4
\] \[
g_{yx}(x, y) = \frac{\partial{g_{y}(x, y)}}{\partial{x}} = \frac{\partial{(4x - 2y)}}{\partial{x}} = 4
\]
e. Evaluate each of the partial derivatives in (d) at the point (0,0)
6Step 6: Evaluate the partial derivatives of \(g(x, y)\) at point (0, 0)
To evaluate the partial derivatives at the point (0, 0), plug in x=0 and y=0 into the partial derivatives found in part (d): \[
g_{x}(0, 0) = -2(0) + 4(0) = 0
\] \[
g_{y}(0, 0) = 4(0) - 2(0) = 0
\] \[
g_{xx}(0, 0) = -2
\] \[
g_{yy}(0, 0) = -2
\] \[
g_{xy}(0, 0) = 4
\] \[
g_{yx}(0, 0) = 4
\]
f. What do the values in (e) suggest about the behavior of \(g\) near (0,0)\(?\) Plot a graph of \(g\) and compare what you see visually to what the values suggest.
Unlike the function f, for function g, it has non-zero mixed partial derivatives \(g_{xy}\) and \(g_{yx}\). The presence of these mixed second-order partial derivatives suggests that the function g has a saddle behavior near (0,0), i.e., it has concave and convex behavior simultaneously in different directions. The graph of the function g would visually show a saddle-shaped surface.
g. What do the functions \(f\) and \(g\) have in common at (0,0)\(?\) What is different? What do your observations tell you regarding the importance of certain second-order partial derivatives?
At the point (0,0), both functions \(f\) and \(g\) have zero values for their first-order partial derivatives (\(f_x, f_y, g_x,\) and \(g_y\)), as well as negative values for their pure second-order partial derivatives (\(f_{xx}, f_{yy}, g_{xx},\) and \(g_{yy}\)). This indicates that both functions don't have increasing or decreasing behavior and are concave down in both the x and y directions.
However, they differ in their mixed second-order partial derivatives (\(f_{xy}, f_{yx}, g_{xy}\) and \(g_{yx}\)). The function f has zero mixed second-order partial derivatives, which indicates a purely parabolic (bowl-shaped) behavior. On the other hand, the function g has non-zero mixed second-order partial derivatives, which indicates a saddle-shaped surface.
This observation tells us that the mixed second-order partial derivatives can provide useful information about the presence of saddle behavior, which cannot be determined from the first-order or pure second-order partial derivatives alone.