Problem 11
Question
The oriented angle between two "vectors" \(z, w \in \mathbb{C}^{*}\) is nothing else but the argument \(\operatorname{Arg}(w / z) .\) Let now \(z=\alpha^{\prime}(0), w=\beta^{\prime}(0) .\) The chain rule gives \((f \circ\) \(\alpha)^{\prime}(0)=f^{\prime}(a) \alpha^{\prime}(0),(f \circ \beta)^{\prime}(0)=f^{\prime}(a) \beta^{\prime}(0)\), which implies $$ \operatorname{Arg} \frac{(f \circ \beta)^{\prime}(0)}{(f \circ \alpha)^{\prime}(0)}=\operatorname{Arg} \frac{\beta^{\prime}(0)}{\alpha^{\prime}(0)} $$
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The argument between the derivatives is unchanged: \(\operatorname{Arg} \frac{\beta^{\prime}(0)}{\alpha^{\prime}(0)}\).
1Step 1: Understand Chain Rule
The chain rule states that if you have two functions \( f \) and \( g \), then the derivative of their composition \((f \circ g)'(x)\) is \( f'(g(x)) \cdot g'(x) \). In this problem, the chain rule is applied twice with \( \alpha \) and \( \beta \).
2Step 2: Apply Chain Rule to \(f \circ \alpha\)
Applying the chain rule to \( (f \circ \alpha)'(0) \), we have \( (f \circ \alpha)'(0) = f'(a) \cdot \alpha'(0) \). This tells us how the derivative of the composition relates to the derivatives of \( f \) and \( \alpha \).
3Step 3: Apply Chain Rule to \(f \circ \beta\)
Similarly, applying the chain rule to \( (f \circ \beta)'(0) \), we find that \( (f \circ \beta)'(0) = f'(a) \cdot \beta'(0) \).
4Step 4: Expressing the Argument
The problem asks for the argument of the quotient \( \operatorname{Arg} \frac{(f \circ \beta)^{\prime}(0)}{(f \circ \alpha)^{\prime}(0)} \), which represents the angle between these two vectors.
5Step 5: Substitute Chain Rule Results
Substitute the results from the chain rule into the expression: \( \operatorname{Arg} \frac{f'(a) \beta'(0)}{f'(a) \alpha'(0)} \).
6Step 6: Simplify the Expression
The \( f'(a) \) terms cancel out in the fraction: \( \operatorname{Arg} \frac{\beta'(0)}{\alpha'(0)} \).
7Step 7: Conclusion
Thus, the argument of the quotient of the derivatives \((f \circ \beta)^{\prime}(0)/(f \circ \alpha)^{\prime}(0)\) is equal to the argument of \(\beta^{\prime}(0)/\alpha^{\prime}(0)\), showing that the oriented angle between them is preserved.
Key Concepts
Chain Rule in CalculusArgument of a Complex NumberVector Angles in Complex Plane
Chain Rule in Calculus
The Chain Rule is a fundamental tool in calculus, especially when dealing with composite functions. It helps us find the derivative of a function that is composed of two or more functions. If you have two functions, say \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\), their composite is \((f \circ g)(x)\) which is essentially \(f(g(x))\). The Chain Rule asserts that the derivative of this composite function is the product of the derivative of \(f\) evaluated at \(g(x)\) and the derivative of \(g\) evaluated at \(x\). Simply expressed, \((f \circ g)'(x) = f'(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)\).
This concept is powerful when tackling problems in complex analysis, as it allows one to manipulate and differentiate complex functions easily by breaking them down into simpler components.
This concept is powerful when tackling problems in complex analysis, as it allows one to manipulate and differentiate complex functions easily by breaking them down into simpler components.
- Evaluate the inner function first.
- Calculate the derivative of the outer function at the inner function.
- Multiply these results to obtain the final derivative.
Argument of a Complex Number
In complex analysis, the argument of a complex number is a significant measure that represents the angle a complex number makes with the positive real axis. Let \(z = x + yi\) be a complex number, where \(x\) is the real part and \(yi\) is the imaginary part. The argument, denoted as \(\operatorname{Arg}(z)\), is the angle \(\theta\) such that \(z\) can be represented in polar form as \(re^{i\theta}\), with \(r\) being the magnitude or modulus of the complex number.
An important thing to remember is the periodicity of angles so that the argument can be adjusted by adding integers of \(2\pi\), as \(\theta + 2n\pi\) still represents the same angle.
An important thing to remember is the periodicity of angles so that the argument can be adjusted by adding integers of \(2\pi\), as \(\theta + 2n\pi\) still represents the same angle.
- Use trigonometry to find \(\theta\): \(\tan^{-1}(y/x)\).
- Expect \(\theta\) in the interval \((-\pi, \pi]\).
- Keep in mind the quadrant to correct the angle if necessary.
Vector Angles in Complex Plane
Vectors in the complex plane can be thought of as arrows pointing from the origin to a point corresponding to a complex number. The angle between two complex vectors \(z\) and \(w\) can provide insight into how these vectors relate direction-wise. Geometrically, this angle is the argument of the quotient \(\operatorname{Arg}\left(\frac{w}{z}\right)\).
These vector angles are crucial in understanding complex transformations, as they retain direction, similar to how angles work in real vector spaces.
These vector angles are crucial in understanding complex transformations, as they retain direction, similar to how angles work in real vector spaces.
- The magnitudes of the vectors don't affect the angle, only direction matters.
- The argument of a quotient encapsulates this angle.
- Orientation and order of vectors play a role in determining the angle direction.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 8
We have \(\left|e^{i z^{2}}\right|=e^{-R^{2} \sin 2 t}\), and use then the estimate $$ \sin (2 t) \geq \frac{4}{\pi} t \quad \text { for } \quad 0 \leq t \leq \
View solution Problem 10
Apply the auxiliary result to \(g:=f / \Gamma .\) For the proof of this auxiliary result show the vanishing of the derivative of the logarithmic derivative \(h(
View solution Problem 15
We can assume \(f(1)=1 .\) Because of the functional equation it is sufficient to prove the identity \(f(x)=\Gamma(x)\) for \(0
View solution Problem 17
Check first that \(\mathcal{C}\) is stable with respect to addition and multiplication of matrices. So \(\mathcal{C}\) is a ring. The map $$ \mathbb{C} \longrig
View solution