Problem 11

Question

Let $A$ be a connected set in a metric space. a) Is $\bar{A}$ connected? Prove or find a counterexample. b) Is A $^{\circ}$ connected? Prove or find a counterexample. Hint: Think of sets in $\mathbb{R}^{2}$.

Step-by-Step Solution

Verified

Answer

a) Yes, $ \bar{A} $ is connected. b) No, $ A^{\circ} $ may not be connected.

1Step 1: Understanding the Problem and Definitions

In a metric space, a set $ A $ is connected if it cannot be partitioned into two nonempty, disjoint open sets. $ \bar{A} $ represents the closure of $ A $, and $ A^{\circ} $ represents the interior of $ A $. We need to determine if $ \bar{A} $ and $ A^{\circ} $ are always connected when $ A $ is connected.

2Step 2: Assessing the Connectivity of $ \bar{A} $

To determine if the closure of a connected set $ A $, $ \bar{A} $, is also connected, we rely on a property from topology: the closure of a connected set is connected. Let's take a connected set $ A $ in any metric space and consider its closure. By definition and this property, $ \bar{A} $ is connected because closure does not alter the property of connectedness; it only adds limit points.

3Step 3: Assessing the Connectivity of $ A^{\circ} $

To analyze whether the interior of a connected set $ A $, $ A^{\circ} $, is also connected, we can use an example in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $. Consider the set $ A = \{ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 : 0 \le x \le 1, y = 0 \text{ or } y = 1 \} $, which is connected (as it's a simple arc joining points). The interior $ A^{\circ} $ is empty as there are no open sets completely contained within $ A $, thus not connected. This serves as a counterexample, showing $ A^{\circ} $ may not be connected.

Key Concepts

Connected SetMetric SpaceClosureInteriorCounterexample

Connected Set

In real analysis, a connected set is a collection of points in a metric space that cannot be split into two or more nonempty, disjoint open sets. Essentially, this means that you can travel between any two points in the set without leaving it.

If a set is connected, then there is no gap between its points.
Contrast this with a disconnected set, where you can find two open sets separating the collection into distinct parts.

In our exercise, the set $A$ is assumed to be connected. Our task is to investigate whether its closure, $\bar{A}$, or its interior, $A^{\circ}$, maintain this property of connectedness.

Metric Space

A metric space is a set together with a distance function, known as a metric, that defines how 'far apart' elements are from each other. This concept forms the backbone for many topics in real analysis, including connectedness.

The metric $d(x, y)$ must satisfy specific properties: non-negativity, identity of indiscernibles, symmetry, and triangle inequality.
Examples include $\mathbb{R}$, the set of real numbers with the usual absolute value metric $|x-y|$, and $\mathbb{R}^n$, the n-dimensional Euclidean space.

For our exercise, having a clear understanding of the metric space ensures that the properties like closure and interior are applied correctly.

Closure

The closure $\bar{A}$ of a set $A$ in a metric space consists of all points in $A$ along with its limit points. This essentially 'closes' the set by including every point that can be approximated by points of $A$.

A limit point of a set is a point that can be reached as close as desired by points of the set, yet it may not be a part of the set.
Closure is obtained by taking the union of the set with its boundary points.

In our context, as per the exercise solution, the closure of a connected set $A$ is always connected. This remains true because boundary or limit points seamlessly connect to the existing set.

Interior

The interior $A^{\circ}$ of a set $A$ is the largest open set contained within $A$. It includes all points of $A$ that are not on the edge of the set. In a metric space, this means every interior point has a small surrounding neighborhood completely inside $A$.

Intuitively, think of the interior as the 'heart' or 'cores' without outer boundary interactions.
If a connected set is thin or string-like, it might have an empty interior.

The exercise provides a counterexample showing that an interior of a connected set can indeed be disconnected or even empty, highlighting that $A^{\circ}$ might not inherit the connectedness of $A$.

Counterexample

Counterexamples are powerful tools to disprove a universal statement by providing an instance where the statement does not hold. They serve as reminders that exceptions often exist in mathematical concepts.

In proving mathematical theorems, finding even a single counterexample can negate a claim.
Counterexamples provide insights into boundaries and exceptional conditions of theoretical statements.
Using counterexamples helps in understanding the limitations and edge cases of mathematical concepts.

In our scenario, a counterexample shows us that while the closure of a connected set $A$ is connected, its interior can sometimes be empty or disconnected, as demonstrated by our discussed set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. This example plays a crucial role in solidifying the understanding of connectedness in different contexts.

Problem 10

Problem 11

Other exercises in this chapter

Problem 10

Take $\mathbb{R}^{*}=\\{-\infty\\} \cup \mathbb{R} \cup\\{\infty\\}$ be the extended reals. Define $d(x, y):=\left|\frac{x}{1+|x|}-\frac{y}{1+|y|}\right|$ i

View solution

Problem 10

a) Working in $\mathbb{R}$, compute $\operatorname{diam}([a, b])$. b) Working in $\mathbb{R}^{n},$ for any $r>0,$ let \(B_{r}:=\left\\{x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}^{

View solution

Problem 11

Suppose $\left\\{V_{n}\right\\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a collection of open sets in $(X, d)$ such that $V_{n+1} \supset V_{n} .$ Let \(\left\\{x_{n}\right\\}\

View solution

Problem 11

Let $(X, d)$ be a compact metric space, let $C(X, \mathbb{R})$ be the set of real-valued continuous functions. Define $$ d(f, g):=\|f-g\|_{u}:=\sup _{x \in

View solution