Problem 108
Question
Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. The proof of the formula for the product of two complex numbers in polar form uses the sum formulas for cosines and sines that I studied in the previous chapter.
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
The statement partially makes sense as the sum formulas for cosines and sines are relevant in dealing with operations on complex numbers, but they are not directly used to derive the multiplication rule for complex numbers in polar form. This rule comes more directly from the operations on complex numbers.
1Step 1: Understanding the statement
First, make sense of the statement given. The formula for the product of two complex numbers in polar form is \(r_1 r_2 (cos(\theta_1 + \theta_2) + i sin(\theta_1 + \theta_2))\), where \(r_1, r_2\) are the magnitudes and \(\theta_1, \theta_2\) are the angles of the two complex numbers respectively. The statement asserts that this formula is derived using the sum formulas for cosines and sines.
2Step 2: Evaluate the statement
Next, recall the sum identities: \(cos(a + b) = cos(a)cos(b) - sin(a)sin(b)\) and \(sin(a + b) = sin(a)cos(b) + cos(a)sin(b)\). These identities do not directly relate to deriving the formula for the product of two complex numbers in polar form. However, the addition within the cosine and sine functions in the formula aligns with these sum identities, implying a certain level of relevance. Therefore, the statement partially makes sense.
3Step 3: Final reasoning
However, while the sum identities for cosines and sines are useful in dealing with complex numbers, they are not directly utilized in deriving the multiplication rule for complex numbers in polar form. This rule comes from operations from complex numbers, where multiplication is done by adding the angles and multiplying the magnitudes. Therefore, it does not completely make sense to say that the formula derives from those identities.
Key Concepts
Polar FormMultiplication of Complex NumbersTrigonometric Identities
Polar Form
Complex numbers can be represented in different ways, one of which is the Polar form. This form is especially useful for multiplication and other operations. A complex number in polar form is expressed as:
- The magnitude ( \( r \)) represents the distance from the origin to the point on the complex plane.
- The angle ( \( \theta \)) shows the direction of the vector relative to the positive x-axis.
Multiplication of Complex Numbers
Multiplying complex numbers is simplified when they are in polar form. This is because of the geometric interpretation of multiplication in this form.When we multiply two complex numbers, say \( z_1 = r_1(\cos \theta_1 + i \sin \theta_1) \) and \( z_2 = r_2(\cos \theta_2 + i \sin \theta_2) \), the result is:\[z_1 \cdot z_2 = r_1r_2(\cos(\theta_1 + \theta_2) + i \sin(\theta_1 + \theta_2))\]Here's what happens step-by-step:
- The magnitudes \( r_1 \) and \( r_2 \) are multiplied.
- The angles \( \theta_1 \) and \( \theta_2 \) are added.
Trigonometric Identities
Trigonometric identities are valuable tools in mathematics. They become handy in many calculations, especially involving angles and rotations.The sum formulas for cosine and sine are particularly worth remembering:
They are fundamental within trigonometric calculations and also frequently appear in complex numbers scenarios, aiding in various transformations and simplifications.
- \( \cos(a + b) = \cos(a)\cos(b) - \sin(a)\sin(b) \)
- \( \sin(a + b) = \sin(a)\cos(b) + \cos(a)\sin(b) \)
They are fundamental within trigonometric calculations and also frequently appear in complex numbers scenarios, aiding in various transformations and simplifications.
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 107
In Exercises 104–107, determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. The resultant force of two forces that ea
View solution Problem 107
Prove that the distance, \(d\), between two points with polar coordinates \(\left(r_{1}, \theta_{1}\right)\) and \(\left(r_{2}, \theta_{2}\right)\) is $$ d=\sqr
View solution Problem 109
Determine whether each statement makes sense or does not make sense, and explain your reasoning. My work with complex numbers verified that the only possible cu
View solution Problem 109
Graph \(y=2 \sin \frac{1}{2} x .\) Then use the graph to obtain the graph of \(y=2 \csc \frac{1}{2} x .\) (Section \(5.6,\) Example 4 )
View solution