Problem 103
Question
Charges \(Q_{1}\) and \(Q_{2}\) lie inside and outside, respectively, of a closed Gaussian surface \(S .\) Let \(E\) be the field at any point on \(S\) and \(\phi\) be the flux of \(E\) over \(S\), (A) If \(Q_{1}\) changes, both \(E\) and \(\phi\) will change. (B) If \(Q_{2}\) changes, \(E\) will change. (C) If \(Q_{1}=0\) and \(Q_{2} \neq 0\) then \(E \neq 0\) but \(\phi=0\). (D) If \(Q_{1} \neq 0\) and \(Q_{2}=0\) then \(E=0\) but \(\phi \neq 0\).
Step-by-Step Solution
Verified Answer
In conclusion, out of the given statements:
- Statement A is correct.
- Statement B is incorrect.
- Statement C is partially correct.
- Statement D is partially correct.
1Step 1: Statement A:
If \(Q_1\) changes, both \(E\) and \(\phi\) will change.
To verify this statement, we need to recall Gauss's law:
\[\phi = \oint_{S} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{dA} = \frac{Q_{\text{enclosed}}}{\varepsilon_0}\]
Given that \(Q_1\) lies inside the Gaussian surface, changing the value of \(Q_1\) will change the total charge enclosed by the surface. The electric field E at any point on S is dependent on the enclosed charge. Therefore, if \(Q_1\) changes, E will change too.
As \(\phi\) is directly proportional to the enclosed charge, changing \(Q_1\) will also cause a change in the electric flux \(\phi\).
Thus, statement A is correct.
2Step 2: Statement B:
If \(Q_2\) changes, \(E\) will change.
In this case, we must remember that the electric field E at any point on the Gaussian surface S is only dependent on the enclosed charge. Since \(Q_2\) lies outside the Gaussian surface, changes in its value do not affect the enclosed charge and thus won't affect the electric field E at any point on the surface S.
Therefore, statement B is incorrect.
3Step 3: Statement C:
If \(Q_1 = 0\) and \(Q_2 \neq 0\) then \(E \neq 0\) but \(\phi = 0\).
Here, we need to analyze two conditions:
1. \(Q_1 = 0\) and \(Q_2 \neq 0\)
2. \(E \neq 0\) but \(\phi = 0\)
If \(Q_1 = 0\), the enclosed charge becomes zero. However, \(Q_2\) is not necessarily equal to zero. We must remember that the field E at the surface S is affected only by the enclosed charge. As there is no enclosed charge due to \(Q_1 = 0\), the electric field E will be equal to zero, contrary to what Statement C says.
Since the enclosed charge is zero, Gauss's law gives us \(\phi = 0\), which is in line with Statement C.
Thus, statement C is partially correct (as only the last part, \(\phi = 0\), is true).
4Step 4: Statement D:
If \(Q_1\neq 0\) and \(Q_2 = 0\) then \(E = 0\) but \(\phi \neq 0\).
In this case, we again need to analyze two conditions:
1. \(Q_1 \neq 0\) and \(Q_2 = 0\)
2. \(E = 0\) but \(\phi \neq 0\)
If \(Q_1 \neq 0\), this charge is enclosed by the Gaussian surface, and therefore, it will affect the electric field E. So, E will not be equal to 0, contrary to what Statement D says.
Now, considering Gauss's law, since \(Q_1 \neq 0\), the electric flux \(\phi\) will not be equal to 0, which is in line with Statement D.
Thus, statement D is partially correct (as only the last part, \(\phi \neq 0\), is true).
Other exercises in this chapter
Problem 101
A non-conducting solid sphere of radius \(R\) is uniformly charged. The magnitude of the electric field due to the sphere at a distance \(r\) form its centre (A
View solution Problem 102
A point charge \(q\) is placed at origin. Let \(\vec{E}_{A}, \vec{E}_{B}\) and \(\vec{E}_{C}\) be the electric field at three points \(A(1,2,3)\), \(B(1,1,-1)\)
View solution Problem 106
Four charges, all of the same magnitude, are placed at the four corners of a square. At the centre of the square, the potential is \(V\) and the field is \(E\).
View solution Problem 107
Three points \(A, B\), and \(C\) are at a distance of \(1 \mathrm{~m}, 2 \mathrm{~m}\), and \(\mathrm{lm}\) from an infinitely long charged wire of linear charg
View solution