Problem 1
Question
Use your technology to find a fourth degree polynomial close to the data in the table below taken from the graph of average solar intensity at Eugene, Oregon in Figure 9.1 .3 on page 405 . $$ \begin{array}{lrrrrrrr} \text { Day } & 1 & 60 & 120 & 180 & 240 & 300 & 360 \\ \text { Day minus 180 } & -179 & -120 & -60 & 0 & 60 & 120 & 180 \\ \text { Solar intensity, kw-hr/m }^{2} & 1.0 & 2.0 & 4.5 & 6.7 & 5.6 & 1.8 & 1.0 \end{array} $$ Your technology will object that the equations to compute the coefficients of a fourth degree polynomial to the Day - Solar Intensity data are ill conditioned (subject to roundoff error); the equations to fit Day minus 180 - Solar Intensity are OK. Therefore, fit a fourth degree polynomial to the Day minus 180 - Solar Intensity data, and interpret the polynomial according for plotting the data and for integration. You should get $$ \begin{array}{c} P(t)=8.733910^{-9}(t-180)^{4}-1.222510^{-7}(t-180)^{3}-4.558710^{-4}(t-180)^{2} \\\ +3.414910^{-3}(t-180)+6.63072 \end{array} $$ a. Plot the data and a graph of your polynomial. b. Compute the integral of \(\int_{0}^{365} P_{2}(t) d t\). c. Compare your answers to the estimate of 1324 computed using the trapezoid rule on 12 intervals of length 30 and one interval of length \(5,\) in Exercise 9.1 .3 on page 404 .
Step-by-Step Solution
VerifiedKey Concepts
Numerical Integration
To perform numerical integration, one typically uses methods like the trapezoid rule, Simpson's rule, or software tools with built-in capabilities for integration. These methods are particularly useful when working with complex polynomial functions where manual calculation is unfeasible.
The integral \[ \int_{0}^{365} P(t) \, dt \] involves integrating the obtained polynomial over the interval from 0 to 365, which represents the number of days in a year. By performing this integration, one can determine the total solar intensity over the specified period. The accuracy of this result can be compared with estimates derived from simpler numerical techniques like the trapezoid rule.
Data Fitting
To achieve this, one could use various technology tools that perform polynomial regression. These tools generate a polynomial equation where the coefficients are calculated to minimize the deviation between the data points and the curve. The result is a polynomial function, \[ P(t) \], that models the solar intensity data as accurately as possible.
Fitting a polynomial to transform 'Day minus 180' data offers a stable option that minimizes ill-conditioning. It reduces roundoff errors, as it centralizes the data, improving the fitting accuracy and leading to a better representation of the change in solar intensity.
Graphing Tools
Various software applications and graphing calculators can be used for this task. They allow you to input data, calculate the polynomial, and display the graph simultaneously. Visual inspection helps in ensuring that the polynomial correctly models trends in the data, such as peaks and troughs in solar intensity over time.
Moreover, interactive graphing tools provide additional features like zooming and adjusting viewports, which facilitate a detailed examination of the polynomial’s accuracy in different segments of the dataset. These tools are essential for both educational purposes and advanced scientific analysis.
Trapezoid Rule
For the solar intensity data and its fourth-degree polynomial representation, the trapezoid rule can serve as a comparison method. By constructing trapezoids between data points and summing their areas, we arrive at an estimated value for the integral.\[ \text{Estimate using trapezoid rule} = 1324 \]
This rule is particularly useful when the function under consideration is complex. Breaking the range of integration (0 to 365 days) into smaller intervals makes the calculation of areas more manageable and the estimation more accurate. In this specific context, using 12 intervals of length 30 and one of length 5 provides a robust estimate against which the polynomial's integral can be compared, thereby validating the performance of the polynomial model.